Loading…
Characteristics and Performances of Blended Polyethersulfone and Carbon‐Based Nanomaterial Membranes: Effect of Nanomaterial Types and Air Exposure
Polyethersulfone (PES) is a widely used polymeric material for ultrafiltration or nanofiltration membranes. To enhance membrane permeability, rejection, and antifouling performance, the effect of four different types of carbon‐based nanomaterials and air exposures during PES/carbon‐based nanomateria...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemical engineering & technology 2020-08, Vol.43 (8), p.1630-1637 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Polyethersulfone (PES) is a widely used polymeric material for ultrafiltration or nanofiltration membranes. To enhance membrane permeability, rejection, and antifouling performance, the effect of four different types of carbon‐based nanomaterials and air exposures during PES/carbon‐based nanomaterial membrane fabrication was evaluated. The carbon‐based nanomaterials were pristine carbon nanotubes, oxidized CNTs (CNTs‐O), pristine graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs‐P), and oxidized graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs‐O). The characteristics and performances of pure and blended membranes were investigated based on their permeability, porosity, morphology, and hydrophobicity. Longer air contact time during membrane preparation resulted in lower membrane permeability, hydrophobicity, and porosity. All fabricated membranes tended to have channelled sponge‐like structure, and highest permeability was attributed to the PES/GNPs‐O membrane.
Membrane properties and characteristics obtained through phase inversion depend on numerous parameters and the techniques applied during preparation and processes. Impregnation of different carbon‐based nanomaterials in a polymeric membrane and air exposure treatment resulted in different membrane features which were compared to the pristine polymeric membrane. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-7516 1521-4125 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ceat.201900582 |