Tree‐Branching‐Based Enhancement of Kinetic Energy Models for Reproducing Channelization Processes of Pyroclastic Density Currents

• Published in: Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Aravena, A., Cioni, R., Bevilacqua, A., Michieli Vitturi, M., Esposti Ongaro, T., Neri, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: box model; Channeling; Channelization; Density currents; Depth perception; Distance; Energy; energy cone model; Geophysics; Kinetic energy; Model accuracy; Model testing; numerical modeling; Potential energy; pyroclastic density currents; Strategy; volcanic hazards; volcanic risks; Volcanoes
• ISSN: 2169-9313; 2169-9356
• DOI: 10.1029/2019JB019271

Kinetic energy models, also called kinetic models, are simple tools able to provide a fast estimate of the inundation area of pyroclastic density currents (PDCs). They are based on the calculation of the PDC front kinetic energy as a function of the distance from a source point. On a three‐dimensional topography, the PDC runout distance is estimated by comparing the flow kinetic energy with the potential energy associated with the topographic obstacles encountered by the PDC. Since kinetic models do not consider the occurrence of channelization processes, the modeled inundation areas can be significantly different from those observed in real deposits. To address this point, we present a new strategy that allows improving kinetic models by considering flow channelization processes, and consists in the inclusion of secondary source points in the expected channelization zones, adopting a tree branch‐like structure. This strategy is based on the redistribution of a key physical variable, such as the flow energy or mass depending on the considered kinetic model, and requires the adoption of appropriate equations for setting the characteristics of the secondary sources. Two models were modified by applying this strategy: the energy cone and the box model. We tested these branching models by comparing their results with those derived from their traditional formulations and from a two‐dimensional depth‐averaged model, considering two specific volcanoes (Chaitén and Citlaltépetl). Thereby, we show the capability of this strategy of improving the accuracy of kinetic models and considering flow channelization processes without including additional, unconstrained input parameters. Key Points We present a new strategy for modifying kinetic models to consider the occurrence of channelization processes of pyroclastic material Two widely used kinetic models are modified by implementing this strategy: the energy cone and the box model We improve the accuracy of kinetic models without adding new, unconstrained input parameters