Misinterpretation of why black students do not pursue studies in the biological sciences

It is unclear whether the methodology was geared to test a specific hypothesis or to find a model that best fit the selected variables. The author's framing of the commentary suggests that it was meant to test the hypothesis that a number of pre-selected variables may influence a student's...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:South African Journal of Science 2020-07, Vol.116 (SI), p.19-3
Main Authors: Glennon, Kelsey L, White, Joseph, Reynolds, Chevonne, Risenga, Ida, Pillay, Neville, Archibald, Sally, Balkwill, Kevin, Byrne, Marcus, Cron, Glynis, Engelbrecht, Hanlie, Fisher, Jolene, Furniss, David, Madikiza, Kim, Matimolane, Mapula, Parrini, Francesca, Sanders, Ma, Scholes, Robert, Situngu, Sivu, Sym, Stuart, Twine, Wayne, Weiersbye, Isabel, Williams, Vivienne, Witkowski, Ed T.F, Woodford, Darragh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
biological sciences
Careers
conservation
Data analysis
Data collection
Dependent variables
Environmental protection
Ethics
Hypotheses
Racism
Regression analysis
Science
STEM education
Students
Studies
undergraduate studies
Values
Variables
Wildlife conservation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is unclear whether the methodology was geared to test a specific hypothesis or to find a model that best fit the selected variables. The author's framing of the commentary suggests that it was meant to test the hypothesis that a number of pre-selected variables may influence a student's choice when considering studies in the biological sciences. However, as written, the analytical approach appears to use model selection, rather than test an a priori hypothesis. The author describes variables that appear to be sequentially added to the model before a best-fit model is selected. Instead of using the best-fit models, where 'black South African' is no longer a significant variable, the author makes inferences about each model. Further, the variable that makes the largest contribution to explaining variability in the Regression 2 is 'Agrees 'I support wildlife conservation but have no interest in having a career in it". At this point, the variable 'black South African' is far from significant and no interaction effect is shown to support that these are linked to the dependent variable.
ISSN:0038-2353
1996-7489
DOI:10.17159/sajs.2020/8584