Pyoderma gangrenosum in an ulcerative colitis patient during treatment with vedolizumab responded favorably to adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis

• Published in: Journal of clinical apheresis 2020-09, Vol.35 (5), p.488-492
• Main Authors: Shibuya, Tomoyoshi, Haga, Keiichi, Saeki, Michio, Haraikawa, Mayuko, Tsuchihashi, Hitoshi, Okahara, Koki, Nomura, Osamu, Fukushima, Hirofumi, Murakami, Takashi, Ishikawa, Dai, Ikeda, Shigaku, Nagahara, Akihito
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Apheresis; Erythema; granulocyte and monocyte apheresis; Granulocytes; Inflammatory bowel disease; Monoclonal antibodies; pyoderma gangrenosum; Skin diseases; ulcerative colitis
• ISSN: 0733-2459; 1098-1101
• DOI: 10.1002/jca.21821

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an extra‐intestinal skin lesion in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as is erythema nodosum. Vedolizumab (VED) is a monoclonal antibody that targets α4β7 integrin and has an intestinal selective mechanism. Despite good therapeutic effects on colitis, the effect on extra‐intestinal manifestations (EIMs) remains unclear. Here we report a case of ulcerative colitis complicated by PG during treatment with VED, which was successfully treated with prednisolone in combination with adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA). The patient was a 50‐year‐old woman with a past medical history of extensive ulcerative colitis managed by golimumab (GLM). She developed flare symptoms due to loss of response to GLM, and treatment was switched to VED. Her gastrointestinal symptoms were improved with VED treatment with less frequent bowel movements. However, infiltrative erythema with pain appeared on the right lower leg and right knee, and expanded and gradually ulcerated. Her skin lesions were treated with corticosteroid, but showed poor improvement. Therefore, granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) treatment was administered in combination with prednisolone. After 3 months, the ulcer gradually improved, and at the time of this writing, the eruptions were nearly replaced by epithelial tissue. This case study showed that patients with UC and EIMS may respond well to combination therapy of VED and GMA. GMA has a very favorable safety profile. On the other hand, the causal connection between VED and PG is still unclear. We believe that a combination therapy involving VED and GMA in IBD patients with EIMs warrants consideration.