Loading…
I Wrote Them All: Forgery and Forms of Classification in Trollope’s Orley Farm
[...]she is cleared of all charges, but Lady Mason is, in fact, guilty of both forgery and perjury. [...]a review in the National Magazine suggests that while Orley Farm had the potential to cross genres into sensation fiction, it does not: [...]when he enters the debate over the “great division” be...
Saved in:
Published in: | Victorian review 2019-10, Vol.45 (2), p.307-323 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [...]she is cleared of all charges, but Lady Mason is, in fact, guilty of both forgery and perjury. [...]a review in the National Magazine suggests that while Orley Farm had the potential to cross genres into sensation fiction, it does not: [...]when he enters the debate over the “great division” between realist and sensation fiction, Trollope notes his identification as “a realist,” and then surprisingly complicates easy classification altogether: “All this is, I think, a mistake,—which . . . arises from the inability of the imperfect artist to be at the same time realistic and sensational. [...]I argue that it is these internal concerns with classification and its permeations—in a wide range of discourses, including scientific and legal—that make the novel itself difficult to classify. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0848-1512 1923-3280 1923-3280 |
DOI: | 10.1353/vcr.2019.0061 |