Loading…

I Wrote Them All: Forgery and Forms of Classification in Trollope’s Orley Farm

[...]she is cleared of all charges, but Lady Mason is, in fact, guilty of both forgery and perjury. [...]a review in the National Magazine suggests that while Orley Farm had the potential to cross genres into sensation fiction, it does not: [...]when he enters the debate over the “great division” be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Victorian review 2019-10, Vol.45 (2), p.307-323
Main Author: GILBERT, KATHERINE
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[...]she is cleared of all charges, but Lady Mason is, in fact, guilty of both forgery and perjury. [...]a review in the National Magazine suggests that while Orley Farm had the potential to cross genres into sensation fiction, it does not: [...]when he enters the debate over the “great division” between realist and sensation fiction, Trollope notes his identification as “a realist,” and then surprisingly complicates easy classification altogether: “All this is, I think, a mistake,—which . . . arises from the inability of the imperfect artist to be at the same time realistic and sensational. [...]I argue that it is these internal concerns with classification and its permeations—in a wide range of discourses, including scientific and legal—that make the novel itself difficult to classify.
ISSN:0848-1512
1923-3280
1923-3280
DOI:10.1353/vcr.2019.0061