Fugitive Listening: Sounds from the Undercommons

• Published in: Theory, culture & society culture & society, 2020-11, Vol.37 (6), p.25-45
• Main Author: Navin Brooks, Andrew
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Contractualism; Decolonization; Ears; Enlightenment; Fugitives; Gossip; Liberalism; Listening; Politics; Racism; Radicalism; Sound; Speech; Subjectivity; Tracking; Voices
• ISSN: 0263-2764; 1460-3616
• DOI: 10.1177/0263276420911962

This essay builds on various critiques of the relationship between the voice and autonomous individual subjectivity, briefly tracking the specific history through which the voice transformed into an ideal object representing the liberal subject of post-Enlightenment thought. This paper asks: what are we to make of those enfleshed voices that do not conform to the ideal voice of the self-possessed liberal subject? What are we to make of those voices that refuse the imperative of improvement that underpins social and economic contractualism? How might we attend to the sonicity of those voices that refuse to individuate, possess, and accumulate? And what fugitive modes of speech might be transmitted by such un-formed and un-organized voices? Against the idealized voice of liberalism, and the gendered and racialized exclusions that this voice implies, I propose a mode of fugitive listening that allows us to open our ears to the noisy voices and modes of speech that sound outside the locus of politics proper. Indebted to the Black radical tradition, fugitive listening attends to sonic practices that refuse the given grounds of representation. I argue that fugitive listening is a practice that can be situated in what Stefano Harney and Fred Moten call ‘the undercommons’. The essay concludes by turning to gossip, figuring this noisy modality of speech as central to undercommon spaces shaped by Black performance.