Loading…

Features of fourth power behavior of structured shock waves in selected solids

Three solid materials that exhibit steady structured shock-wave fourth-power dependence of shock pressure step versus strain rate are examined in further detail. They are, respectively the compound aluminum oxide, the metal uranium and the molecular crystal HMX. For Al2O3 and HMX, both polycrystalli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grady, D. E.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Three solid materials that exhibit steady structured shock-wave fourth-power dependence of shock pressure step versus strain rate are examined in further detail. They are, respectively the compound aluminum oxide, the metal uranium and the molecular crystal HMX. For Al2O3 and HMX, both polycrystalline and single crystal structured wave data are examined. For both materials the plot of polycrystal and single crystal data overlay in the pressure versus strain rate plot. Further, for polycrystalline Al2O3 and uranium the data span of steady-wave widths exceeds the crystal grain size by one to two orders of magnitude. Structured wave data for unalloyed alpha uranium and uranium six percent niobium are compared in the pressure versus strain rate presentation. Both metals exhibit fourth-power pressure versus strain rate behavior, however, U6Nb reveals markedly reduced shock viscosity relative to alpha uranium. In contrast, selected shock compaction Hugoniot data for granular materials are described that exhibit pressure versus strain rate power-law dependence with powers ranging between one and two. Underlying implications and possible sources of the experimental observations are discussed. A statistics base perspective is pursued that offers a sensible account for the underlying the shock failure transition including the universal power-law trends of the structure shock data.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/12.0000886