Facing away from the interviewer: Evidence of little benefit to eyewitnesses' memory performance

Summary Averting gaze from another person's face generally improves cognitive performance, yet, little is known about how witnesses' gaze direction affects their recall during investigative interviews. Here, participants witnessed a video‐recorded incident, and were interviewed via free re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied cognitive psychology 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.1310-1322
Main Authors: Nash, Alena, Ridout, Nathan, Nash, Robert A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aversion
Cognitive ability
Effect Size
Experiments
Eye fixation
Eye Movements
Free recall
Interpersonal Communication
Interviews
Manipulation
Memory
Meta Analysis
Nonverbal Communication
Recall (Psychology)
Systematic review
Witnesses
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Averting gaze from another person's face generally improves cognitive performance, yet, little is known about how witnesses' gaze direction affects their recall during investigative interviews. Here, participants witnessed a video‐recorded incident, and were interviewed via free recall and closed questions following a short delay. In Experiment 1, participants either faced the interviewer or faced away during the interview. In Experiment 2, alongside this manipulation, the interviewer also either faced the witness or faced away. In Experiment 3, witness gaze direction was manipulated alongside rapport‐building. In Experiment 4, the effect of facing away was directly compared with that of eye‐closure. Mini meta‐analysis of all four experiments showed that the effect of witness gaze direction on memory performance was minimal. Furthermore, neither aversion of interviewer's gaze nor rapport‐building magnified this effect. Added to the cumulative literature on eyewitness gaze aversion, these findings afford better estimates of the likely size of these effects.
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.3723