SoftMemoryBox II: A Scalable, Shared Memory Buffer Framework for Accelerating Distributed Training of Large-Scale Deep Neural Networks

• Published in: IEEE access 2020, Vol.8, p.207097-207111
• Main Authors: Ahn, Shinyoung, Lim, Eunji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Artificial neural networks; Bandwidth; Bandwidths; Buffers; Communication; Deep learning; deep neural networks; distributed computing; distributed deep learning; Distributed processing; Exchanging; High-performance computing; Libraries; Message passing; Neural networks; Parallel processing; Parameters; Servers; shared memory buffer; SoftMemoryBox II; Synchronism; Synchronization; Training
• ISSN: 2169-3536; 2169-3536
• DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038112

Distributed processing using high-performance computing resources is essential for developers to train large-scale deep neural networks (DNNs). The major impediment to distributed DNN training is the communication bottleneck during the parameter exchange among the distributed DNN training workers. The communication bottleneck increases training time and decreases the utilization of the computational resources. Our previous study, SoftMemoryBox (SMB1) presented considerably superior performance compared to message passing interface (MPI) in the parameter communication of distributed DNN training. However, SMB1 had disadvantages such as the limited scalability of the distributed DNN training due to the restricted communication bandwidth from a single memory server, inability to provide a synchronization function for the shared memory buffer, and low portability/usability as a consequence of the kernel-level implementation. This paper proposes a scalable, shared memory buffer framework, called SoftMemoryBox II (SMB2), which overcomes the shortcomings of SMB1. With SMB2, distributed training processes can easily share virtually unified shared memory buffers composed of memory segments provided from remote memory servers and can exchange DNN parameters at high speed through the shared memory buffer. The scalable communication bandwidth of the SMB2 framework facilitates the reduction of DNN distributed training times compared to SMB1. According to intensive evaluation results, the communication bandwidth of the proposed SMB2 is 6.3 times greater than that of SMB1 when the SMB2 framework is scaled out to use eight memory servers. Moreover, the training time of SMB2-based asynchronous distributed training of five DNN models is up to 2.4 times faster than SMB1-based training.