Two countries, one policy: A comparative synthesis of early childhood English language education in China and Australia

• Published in: Children and youth services review 2020-11, Vol.118, p.105386, Article 105386
• Main Authors: Liang, Luyao, Li, Hui, Chik, Alice
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Australia; Childhood; China; Comparative studies; Comparative synthesis; Dialects; Directing; Early childhood education; English as a second language; English language; English language education; Foreign languages; Inactive; Language policy; Policy making; Sociolinguistics
• ISSN: 0190-7409; 1873-7765
• DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105386

•Children in China and Australia learn English in distinct sociolinguistic contexts.•China forbids early childhood English education, despite great parental demand.•Australia has no curriculum framework for early childhood English education.•Both countries are similarly inactive in guiding early childhood English education. Although English is taught to students worldwide at different educational levels, the actual implementation of early childhood English language education (ECELE) may vary from country to country. This study aims to comprehensively compare how ECELE is being put into practice in China and Australia, where young children learn English as a foreign language and as an additional language or dialect, respectively. Based on a critical analysis of relevant policy documents and the empirical studies found in the literature, this paper provides a detailed account and comparison of how ECELE is delivered in China and Australia. It is found that despite their different sociolinguistic contexts, the educational authorities in both countries share the same ostrich policy and inactive involvement in overseeing and directing ECELE. The implications for policymaking are also addressed.