High‐resolution peak analysis in TOF SIMS data

High mass resolution time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF SIMS) can provide a wealth of chemical information about a sample, but the analysis of such data is complicated by detector dead‐time effects that lead to systematic shifts in peak shapes, positions, and intensities. We introdu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surface and interface analysis 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.53-67
Main Authors: Gelb, Lev D., Shahrokh Esfahani, Negar, Walker, Amy V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Amorphous materials
Bias
Data analysis
Mathematical models
Metallic glasses
Multilayers
Secondary ion mass spectrometry
Shape functions
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:High mass resolution time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF SIMS) can provide a wealth of chemical information about a sample, but the analysis of such data is complicated by detector dead‐time effects that lead to systematic shifts in peak shapes, positions, and intensities. We introduce a new maximum‐likelihood analysis that incorporates the detector behavior in the likelihood function, such that a parametric spectrum model can be fit directly to as‐measured data. In numerical testing, this approach is shown to be the most precise and lowest‐bias option when compared with both weighted and unweighted least‐squares fitting of data corrected for dead‐time effects. Unweighted least‐squares analysis is the next best, while weighted least‐squares suffers from significant bias when the number of pulses used is small. We also provide best‐case estimates of the achievable precision in fitting TOF SIMS peak positions and intensities and investigate the biases introduced by ignoring background intensity and by fitting to just the intense part of a peak. We apply the maximum‐likelihood method to fit two experimental data sets: a positive‐ion spectrum from a multilayer MoS2 sample and a positive‐ion spectrum from a TiZrNi bulk metallic glass sample. The precision of extracted isotope masses and relative abundances obtained is close to the best‐case predictions from the numerical simulations despite the use of inexact peak shape functions and other approximations. Implications for instrument calibration, incorporation of prior information about the sample, and extension of this approach to the analysis of imaging data are also discussed.
ISSN:0142-2421
1096-9918
DOI:10.1002/sia.6872