Two Indices Are Better than One: Building on Robbins, Nolan, and Chen (2017)

When informants from a given culture are asked to list items from a specified semantic domain, their lists provide two indicators of each term’s prominence or salience: its frequency of appearance across lists and its mean position within the lists that include it. Smith et al. (1995), Sutrop (2001)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Field methods 2021-02, Vol.33 (1), p.42-51
Main Authors: Bimler, David, Uusküla, Mari
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Correlation
Graphs
Incidence
Information sources
Semantics
Vocabulary
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When informants from a given culture are asked to list items from a specified semantic domain, their lists provide two indicators of each term’s prominence or salience: its frequency of appearance across lists and its mean position within the lists that include it. Smith et al. (1995), Sutrop (2001), and most recently Robbins et al. (2017) have defined salience measures that combine these two sources of information. We argue that although frequency and mean position are correlated, the association between them is not perfect and not linear. Plotting them as separate axes of a scatterplot can be informative and complementary to combining them in a single salience measure. We illustrate this with scatterplots for three semantic domains: color terms, animal names, and body parts.
ISSN:1525-822X
1552-3969
DOI:10.1177/1525822X20945063