Lassie: HOL4 Tactics by Example

• Published in: arXiv.org 2021-01
• Main Authors: Becker, Heiko, Bos, Nathaniel, Gavran, Ivan, Darulova, Eva, Majumdar, Rupak
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Learning curves; Tactics; Theorem proving
• ISSN: 2331-8422
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.00930

Proof engineering efforts using interactive theorem proving have yielded several impressive projects in software systems and mathematics. A key obstacle to such efforts is the requirement that the domain expert is also an expert in the low-level details in constructing the proof in a theorem prover. In particular, the user needs to select a sequence of tactics that lead to a successful proof, a task that in general requires knowledge of the exact names and use of a large set of tactics. We present Lassie, a tactic framework for the HOL4 theorem prover that allows individual users to define their own tactic language by example and give frequently used tactics or tactic combinations easier-to-remember names. The core of Lassie is an extensible semantic parser, which allows the user to interactively extend the tactic language through a process of definitional generalization. Defining tactics in Lassie thus does not require any knowledge in implementing custom tactics, while proofs written in Lassie retain the correctness guarantees provided by the HOL4 system. We show through case studies how Lassie can be used in small and larger proofs by novice and more experienced interactive theorem prover users, and how we envision it to ease the learning curve in a HOL4 tutorial.