Multi-spark model for predicting surface roughness of electrical discharge textured surfaces

• Published in: International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2020-02, Vol.106 (9-10), p.3741-3758
• Main Authors: Jithin, S., Bhandarkar, Upendra V., Joshi, Suhas S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: CAE) and Design; Computer simulation; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD; Electric discharges; Energy levels; Engineering; Gaussian distribution; Heat flux; Industrial and Production Engineering; Material properties; Mathematical models; Mechanical Engineering; Media Management; Original Article; Parameters; Predictions; Simulation; Surface roughness; Temperature dependence; Valleys
• ISSN: 0268-3768; 1433-3015
• DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04841-5

Several models in the literature predict the average surface roughness ( R a ) of electrical discharge textured surfaces using either a single-spark simulation for roughness estimation, or a multi-spark simulation with a uniform or a symmetric distribution of sparks. This paper presents an improved approach for surface roughness prediction, by generating surface profiles with the stochastic distribution of sparks with respect to the following: (i) location, (ii) energy level, and (iii) time. In addition, the formulation for single-spark adopts better assumptions, such as a Gaussian heat flux distribution for sparks, temperature dependency of material properties, and the operating parameter-dependent variation of factors, such as spark radius, cathode energy fraction, and plasma flushing efficiency. Surface profiles are simulated by the multi-spark model, considering the stochastic distribution of crater profiles, which are evaluated by the single-spark model. Unique profiles are obtained for each run of the multi-spark model, for a particular parameter combination. They vary in location, size, and shape of individual peaks and valleys, among each other due to this stochastic distribution of sparks. This variation among profiles agrees well with the variable distribution of peaks and valleys in actual EDTed surface profiles. It is observed that an increase in discharge current and pulse on-time leads to a lesser number of peaks and valleys, and a higher peak-to-valley height on the surface profile, due to increase in individual crater dimensions. The adoption of the more realistic assumptions in current model reduces the average R a prediction error to 11.5%.