Loading…
0762 Efficacy Of Pitolisant In Patients With High Burden Of Narcolepsy Symptoms
Abstract Introduction Recent literature suggests that histamine may play an important role in narcolepsy. This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, in patients with high burden of the main narcolepsy symptoms. Methods Data we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-05, Vol.43 (Supplement_1), p.A289-A290 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract
Introduction
Recent literature suggests that histamine may play an important role in narcolepsy. This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, in patients with high burden of the main narcolepsy symptoms.
Methods
Data were pooled from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, 7- and 8-week studies of pitolisant (individually titrated; maximum dose, 35.6 mg/day) in adults with narcolepsy. Analyses included 3 independent patient subgroups: baseline score of >16 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), sleep latency of ≤8 minutes on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), and ≥15 cataplexy attacks per week.
Results
The analysis populations included 108 patients for the ESS (pitolisant, n=54; placebo, n=54), 105 for the MWT (pitolisant, n=59; placebo, n=46), and 31 for cataplexy (pitolisant, n=20; placebo, n=11). Mean change in ESS from baseline was significantly greater for pitolisant (-6.1) compared with placebo (-2.6; P=0.0002). A significantly greater percentage of pitolisant-treated patients were classified as treatment responders: for ESS score reduction ≥3, 68.5% in the pitolisant group versus 35.2% in the placebo group (P=0.0006); for final ESS score ≤10, 35.2% versus 9.3%, respectively (P=0.0026). Mean increase in sleep latency on the MWT was significantly greater for pitolisant (7.0 minutes) compared with placebo (3.4 minutes; P=0.0089). Decrease in mean weekly rate of cataplexy was significantly greater for pitolisant (baseline, 21.8; final, 3.9) compared with placebo (baseline, 20.9; final, 18.2); the rate ratio was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26‒0.47; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-8105 1550-9109 |
DOI: | 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.758 |