Loading…

0294 RESILIENCE, EMOTION AND AROUSAL REGULATION IN INSOMNIA DISORDER

Abstract Introduction: According to the diathesis-stress model of insomnia, a vulnerability to developing it may lead to insomnia in response to stress. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the understanding of resilience in context of stress- risk-vulnerability dimension. Resilience is a ps...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2017-04, Vol.40 (suppl_1), p.A108-A109
Main Authors: Palagini, L, Olivia, B, Petri, E, Cipollone, G, Moretto, U, Perugi, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction: According to the diathesis-stress model of insomnia, a vulnerability to developing it may lead to insomnia in response to stress. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the understanding of resilience in context of stress- risk-vulnerability dimension. Resilience is a psychobiological factor which determines individual’s capacity to adapt successfully to stressful events. Lower level of resilience increases vulnerability for developing mental disorders. Beacuse emotion and arousal regulation is a key factor in insomnia the aim was to explore the level of resiliency in subjects with insomnia and its relationship with emotion and arousal regulation. Methods: The study consisted of 48 subjects with Insomnia disorder according to the DSM-5 and 35 good sleepers. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Pre-sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS) were administered while controlling for anxiety and depressive symptoms. Differences in means between groups were assessed using t-test or Mann-Whitney U/Wilcoxon test. Univariate/ multivariate regression analyses and mediation analyses were performed. Results: Subjects with Insomnia (F 24, mean age 49 ± 2.1) presented higher ISI, RSA, DERS and PSAS scores than good sleepers (F 22, mean age 47.2 ± 1.2) (ISI: 15.7 ± 5.8 vs 5.1 ± 0.6, p
ISSN:0161-8105
1550-9109
DOI:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.293