Multi-level fleet size optimization for containers handling using double-cycling strategy

• Published in: Expert systems with applications 2021-05, Vol.170, p.114526, Article 114526
• Main Authors: El-Abbasy, Mohammed Saeed, Ahmed, Essmeil, Zayed, Tarek, Alfalah, Ghasan, Alkass, Sabah
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Container Handling; Containers; Cycles; Double-Cycling; Fleet Size; Genetic algorithms; Handling; Handling equipment; Multi-level Optimization; NSGA-II; Optimization; Productivity; Sorting algorithms; Vessels
• ISSN: 0957-4174; 1873-6793
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114526

•Optimization of fleet size combination in containers terminal is presented.•The optimization minimizes both vessel turnaround time and handling cost.•A new double-cycling handling strategy is incorporated in the optimization process.•The new strategy saved 20% in both time and cost and increased productivity by 25% Every few years, larger containerized vessels are introduced to the market to accommodate the increase in global trade. Although increasing the capacity of vessels results in maximizing the amount of imported and exported goods per voyage, yet it is accompanied with new challenges to terminal planners. One of the primary challenges is minimizing the vessel turnaround time with the least possible cost. In this context, this paper presents the development of a multi-level optimization model using the elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) to determine the optimal or near-optimal fleet size combination of the different container handling equipment used in the terminal. The model aims to minimize two conflicting objective functions, namely, vessel turnaround time and total handling cost. Furthermore, the model considers a double-cycling strategy for the container handling process to achieve increased productivity and eventually more reduction in the vessel turnaround time. The model was implemented on a real-life case study to demonstrate its efficiency and the benefit of employing the double-cycling strategy compared with the traditional single-cycling strategy. The results demonstrated the efficiency of employing the double-cycling strategy by providing a reduction of above 20% in both the vessel turnaround time and the total handling cost and an increase of above 25% in the productivity when compared to the traditional single-cycling strategy.