Offender Decision-Making and Displacement

Rational choice approaches to offender decision-making typically focus on the choice to offend or not. In this mixed-method study, we explore how offenders respond to crime control and prevention measures using a framework incorporating displacement options. Semi-structured interviews of 200 adult o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Justice quarterly 2021-04, Vol.38 (3), p.375-405
Main Authors: Rossmo, D. Kim, Summers, Lucia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Burglary
Crime
Crime prevention
Criminals
Decision making
Displacement
offender interviews
Offenders
Prevention
Rational choice
Robbery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rational choice approaches to offender decision-making typically focus on the choice to offend or not. In this mixed-method study, we explore how offenders respond to crime control and prevention measures using a framework incorporating displacement options. Semi-structured interviews of 200 adult offenders convicted of burglary, robbery, or theft were conducted in Texas. Subjects first described experiences in which they wanted to offend but chose not to do so due to a control measure. They then evaluated a list of control measures and indicated whether they led to desistance or displacement. Finally, they were given situational crime vignettes involving a prevention measure, followed by five displacement choices and a desistance option. Responses often favored crime displacement, highlighting the need to go beyond a dichotomized offend/desist choice, and suggesting displacement is more prevalent than previously thought. Displacement should be considered when designing crime control measures to help maximize their impact.
ISSN:0741-8825
1745-9109
DOI:10.1080/07418825.2019.1666904