On money as a conventional sign: revisiting Aristotle's conception of money

Regardless of the historical evolution of money, some passages of Aristotle's works shed light on its meaning and nature. This paper will attentively consider these passages. The first section presents Aristotle's thoughts on money. While the second section analyses money as a unit of meas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of institutional economics 2021-06, Vol.17 (3), p.459-471
Main Author: Crespo, Ricardo F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Conventions
Economic theory
Free will
History
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Regardless of the historical evolution of money, some passages of Aristotle's works shed light on its meaning and nature. This paper will attentively consider these passages. The first section presents Aristotle's thoughts on money. While the second section analyses money as a unit of measurement, the third section deals with its conventional nature, and the fourth draws from the theories of signs elaborated by John Poinsot and Charles Peirce to expand the explanation of the nature of money as a sign. The conclusion considers three levels of consideration of money based on Aristotle's thoughts: (1) universal abstract money, (2) instantiated in specific currencies, and (3) the actualization of their properties and potentialities in actual economic dealings.
ISSN:1744-1374
1744-1382
DOI:10.1017/S1744137420000570