Counteracting detrimental effects of misconceptions on learning and metacomprehension accuracy: The utility of refutation texts and think sheets

Previous research has shown that misconceptions impair not only learners’ text comprehension and knowledge transfer but also the accuracy with which they predict their comprehension and transfer. In the present experiment with N  = 92 university students, we investigated to what extent reading a ref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Instructional science 2021-04, Vol.49 (2), p.165-195
Main Authors: Prinz, Anja, Golke, Stefanie, Wittwer, Jörg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
College Students
Comprehension
Delayed
Education
Educational Psychology
Information sharing
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Learning Processes
Metacognition
Misconceptions
Original Research
Pedagogic Psychology
Persuasive Discourse
Reading Comprehension
Side effects
Teaching Methods
Worksheets
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous research has shown that misconceptions impair not only learners’ text comprehension and knowledge transfer but also the accuracy with which they predict their comprehension and transfer. In the present experiment with N  = 92 university students, we investigated to what extent reading a refutation text or completing a think sheet compared with a control condition counteracts these adverse effects of misconceptions. The results revealed that both reading a refutation text and completing a think sheet supported learners with misconceptions in acquiring and accurately predicting their comprehension. Completing a think sheet additionally supported the learners in transferring their newly acquired knowledge, even though they were underconfident in their ability to do so. Moreover, learners who completed a think sheet were generally more accurate in discriminating between correctly and incorrectly answered test questions. Finally, delayed testing showed that the learning effects were quite stable, independent of the instructional method. This study reinforces the effectiveness of refutation texts and think sheets and provides important practical implications and avenues for future research.
ISSN:0020-4277
1573-1952
DOI:10.1007/s11251-021-09535-8