Loading…

Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment

Phthalate acid ester, di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is ubiquitously detected contaminant of emerging concerns (CECs) in all the environmental samples. The present study attempted to understand the fate and transport of DEHP in urban areas by evaluating the quantities, distribution, risk, and ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water environment research 2021-06, Vol.93 (6), p.940-952
Main Authors: Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah, Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra, Harini, Revanna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3
container_end_page 952
container_issue 6
container_start_page 940
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 93
creator Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah
Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra
Harini, Revanna
description Phthalate acid ester, di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is ubiquitously detected contaminant of emerging concerns (CECs) in all the environmental samples. The present study attempted to understand the fate and transport of DEHP in urban areas by evaluating the quantities, distribution, risk, and effects in the Mysuru city, India. The study is anticipated to serve as a vital document for local and national regulators to frame a robust DEHP management plan and mitigate the risks associated. Liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatographic analysis was adopted to determine the concentrations of DEHP. The risk quotient method was adopted to assess potential risk, and a conceptual planning model framework was designed to mitigate the DEHP contamination. The municipal wastewater contained 115 ± 9.2 μg/L, whereas treated municipal wastewater showed 95 ± 7.6 μg/L DEHP that was attributed to the inefficiency of the treatment plant. Further, sediments in surface water, as well as groundwater samples of the study area, showed 8 ± 0.64 to 12 ± 0.96 μg/L and 32 ± 2.56 to 40 ± 3.2 μg/kg of DEHP, respectively. The risk quotient of 19.17 for samples in around treatment indicated highest risk, whereas groundwater samples had a risk quotient of 1–2 indicating relative risk to aquatic organisms. In addition, the study highlighted the source, possible entry pathways, and management strategies including treatment aspects to draw an understanding of the distribution and potential ecological imbalances with contamination of DEHP in the urban sector. Practitioner points Understand the fate and transportation of DEHP in urban wastewater. Primary investigation and assessment to possible health and environmental risks of DEHP contamination in urban wastewater. Revealed the associated health risks and proposed possible management strategies. High risks of DEHP contamination in aqueous ecosystem by municipal wastewater and associated activities which cause health and environmental risks
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wer.1486
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539043828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539043828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMo3sEnkIAbBau59XLciXgDQRTFZUnTiSfapsckVbvzEVz5gD6J8Rx15yoJ8-WbYX6ENijZo4Sw_Rdwe1QU2RxapmkqkjzldD7eSUYTwQlfQivePxBCGSNiES1xzkQ-ytky-rjqpQ1GGyWD6ewuro0PzlT97CVtjUFrUMHjTsci3mafb-8QxkMzhteh2cGTcRjLRgbAqrNBtsZOTQf42vjHKJDN4I2fmloTzP20imOT-OXegMfG4t5V0mKwz8Z1tgUb1tCClo2H9Z9zFd2eHN8cnSUXl6fnR4cXiRIkzxIx4oJrnReacg2QCagLqYGkmuZ1JWVRkUJopfJMKV5LKmrBK1nxyOWSZRVfRVsz78R1Tz34UD50vYsz-5KlfEQEL1gRqe0ZpVznvQNdTpxppRtKSsrvAMoYQPkdQEQ3f4R91UL9B_5uPALJDHgxDQz_isq74-up8At-RZRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539043828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah ; Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra ; Harini, Revanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah ; Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra ; Harini, Revanna</creatorcontrib><description>Phthalate acid ester, di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is ubiquitously detected contaminant of emerging concerns (CECs) in all the environmental samples. The present study attempted to understand the fate and transport of DEHP in urban areas by evaluating the quantities, distribution, risk, and effects in the Mysuru city, India. The study is anticipated to serve as a vital document for local and national regulators to frame a robust DEHP management plan and mitigate the risks associated. Liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatographic analysis was adopted to determine the concentrations of DEHP. The risk quotient method was adopted to assess potential risk, and a conceptual planning model framework was designed to mitigate the DEHP contamination. The municipal wastewater contained 115 ± 9.2 μg/L, whereas treated municipal wastewater showed 95 ± 7.6 μg/L DEHP that was attributed to the inefficiency of the treatment plant. Further, sediments in surface water, as well as groundwater samples of the study area, showed 8 ± 0.64 to 12 ± 0.96 μg/L and 32 ± 2.56 to 40 ± 3.2 μg/kg of DEHP, respectively. The risk quotient of 19.17 for samples in around treatment indicated highest risk, whereas groundwater samples had a risk quotient of 1–2 indicating relative risk to aquatic organisms. In addition, the study highlighted the source, possible entry pathways, and management strategies including treatment aspects to draw an understanding of the distribution and potential ecological imbalances with contamination of DEHP in the urban sector. Practitioner points Understand the fate and transportation of DEHP in urban wastewater. Primary investigation and assessment to possible health and environmental risks of DEHP contamination in urban wastewater. Revealed the associated health risks and proposed possible management strategies. High risks of DEHP contamination in aqueous ecosystem by municipal wastewater and associated activities which cause health and environmental risks</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.1486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33247972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic organisms ; Chromatography ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) ; Dioctyl phthalate ; Distribution ; emerging contaminants ; Environmental management ; Environmental risk ; Gas chromatography ; Groundwater ; Groundwater treatment ; Health risks ; management strategies ; Mitigation ; Municipal wastewater ; Phthalates ; Quotients ; Risk analysis ; risk assessment ; risk quotient method ; Risk reduction ; Sediments ; Surface water ; Transport ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water analysis ; water quality ; Water sampling</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2021-06, Vol.93 (6), p.940-952</ispartof><rights>2020 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>2020 Water Environment Federation.</rights><rights>2021 Water Environment Federation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5125-4877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harini, Revanna</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>Phthalate acid ester, di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is ubiquitously detected contaminant of emerging concerns (CECs) in all the environmental samples. The present study attempted to understand the fate and transport of DEHP in urban areas by evaluating the quantities, distribution, risk, and effects in the Mysuru city, India. The study is anticipated to serve as a vital document for local and national regulators to frame a robust DEHP management plan and mitigate the risks associated. Liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatographic analysis was adopted to determine the concentrations of DEHP. The risk quotient method was adopted to assess potential risk, and a conceptual planning model framework was designed to mitigate the DEHP contamination. The municipal wastewater contained 115 ± 9.2 μg/L, whereas treated municipal wastewater showed 95 ± 7.6 μg/L DEHP that was attributed to the inefficiency of the treatment plant. Further, sediments in surface water, as well as groundwater samples of the study area, showed 8 ± 0.64 to 12 ± 0.96 μg/L and 32 ± 2.56 to 40 ± 3.2 μg/kg of DEHP, respectively. The risk quotient of 19.17 for samples in around treatment indicated highest risk, whereas groundwater samples had a risk quotient of 1–2 indicating relative risk to aquatic organisms. In addition, the study highlighted the source, possible entry pathways, and management strategies including treatment aspects to draw an understanding of the distribution and potential ecological imbalances with contamination of DEHP in the urban sector. Practitioner points Understand the fate and transportation of DEHP in urban wastewater. Primary investigation and assessment to possible health and environmental risks of DEHP contamination in urban wastewater. Revealed the associated health risks and proposed possible management strategies. High risks of DEHP contamination in aqueous ecosystem by municipal wastewater and associated activities which cause health and environmental risks</description><subject>Aquatic organisms</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)</subject><subject>Dioctyl phthalate</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>emerging contaminants</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater treatment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>management strategies</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Phthalates</subject><subject>Quotients</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>risk quotient method</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMo3sEnkIAbBau59XLciXgDQRTFZUnTiSfapsckVbvzEVz5gD6J8Rx15yoJ8-WbYX6ENijZo4Sw_Rdwe1QU2RxapmkqkjzldD7eSUYTwQlfQivePxBCGSNiES1xzkQ-ytky-rjqpQ1GGyWD6ewuro0PzlT97CVtjUFrUMHjTsci3mafb-8QxkMzhteh2cGTcRjLRgbAqrNBtsZOTQf42vjHKJDN4I2fmloTzP20imOT-OXegMfG4t5V0mKwz8Z1tgUb1tCClo2H9Z9zFd2eHN8cnSUXl6fnR4cXiRIkzxIx4oJrnReacg2QCagLqYGkmuZ1JWVRkUJopfJMKV5LKmrBK1nxyOWSZRVfRVsz78R1Tz34UD50vYsz-5KlfEQEL1gRqe0ZpVznvQNdTpxppRtKSsrvAMoYQPkdQEQ3f4R91UL9B_5uPALJDHgxDQz_isq74-up8At-RZRg</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah</creator><creator>Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra</creator><creator>Harini, Revanna</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-4877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment</title><author>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah ; Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra ; Harini, Revanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic organisms</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)</topic><topic>Dioctyl phthalate</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>emerging contaminants</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater treatment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>management strategies</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Phthalates</topic><topic>Quotients</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>risk quotient method</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harini, Revanna</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shivaraju, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah</au><au>Yashas, Shivamurthy Ravindra</au><au>Harini, Revanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>940</spage><epage>952</epage><pages>940-952</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>Phthalate acid ester, di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is ubiquitously detected contaminant of emerging concerns (CECs) in all the environmental samples. The present study attempted to understand the fate and transport of DEHP in urban areas by evaluating the quantities, distribution, risk, and effects in the Mysuru city, India. The study is anticipated to serve as a vital document for local and national regulators to frame a robust DEHP management plan and mitigate the risks associated. Liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatographic analysis was adopted to determine the concentrations of DEHP. The risk quotient method was adopted to assess potential risk, and a conceptual planning model framework was designed to mitigate the DEHP contamination. The municipal wastewater contained 115 ± 9.2 μg/L, whereas treated municipal wastewater showed 95 ± 7.6 μg/L DEHP that was attributed to the inefficiency of the treatment plant. Further, sediments in surface water, as well as groundwater samples of the study area, showed 8 ± 0.64 to 12 ± 0.96 μg/L and 32 ± 2.56 to 40 ± 3.2 μg/kg of DEHP, respectively. The risk quotient of 19.17 for samples in around treatment indicated highest risk, whereas groundwater samples had a risk quotient of 1–2 indicating relative risk to aquatic organisms. In addition, the study highlighted the source, possible entry pathways, and management strategies including treatment aspects to draw an understanding of the distribution and potential ecological imbalances with contamination of DEHP in the urban sector. Practitioner points Understand the fate and transportation of DEHP in urban wastewater. Primary investigation and assessment to possible health and environmental risks of DEHP contamination in urban wastewater. Revealed the associated health risks and proposed possible management strategies. High risks of DEHP contamination in aqueous ecosystem by municipal wastewater and associated activities which cause health and environmental risks</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33247972</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.1486</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-4877</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 2021-06, Vol.93 (6), p.940-952
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539043828
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aquatic organisms
Chromatography
Contaminants
Contamination
di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)
Dioctyl phthalate
Distribution
emerging contaminants
Environmental management
Environmental risk
Gas chromatography
Groundwater
Groundwater treatment
Health risks
management strategies
Mitigation
Municipal wastewater
Phthalates
Quotients
Risk analysis
risk assessment
risk quotient method
Risk reduction
Sediments
Surface water
Transport
Urban areas
Urban environments
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Water analysis
water quality
Water sampling
title Quantification, distribution, and effects of di (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination: Risk analysis and mitigation strategies in urban environment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A53%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification,%20distribution,%20and%20effects%20of%20di%20(2%E2%80%90ethylhexyl)%20phthalate%20contamination:%20Risk%20analysis%20and%20mitigation%20strategies%20in%20urban%20environment&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Shivaraju,%20Harikaranahalli%20Puttaiah&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=940&rft.epage=952&rft.pages=940-952&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.1486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539043828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-49343ff78f13fee64ed8afe05f17dbaa8b084fcc76cc3da14d43bab34ed7a26b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539043828&rft_id=info:pmid/33247972&rfr_iscdi=true