Reducing optimism bias in the driver’s seat: Comparing two interventions

•This is one of the few studies to assess two different interventions to reduce optimism bias in young novice drivers.•The results will be of interest to a wide spectrum of academics and non-academic audiences (police, policymakers, fire and rescue services).•The present results have clear implicati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2021-04, Vol.78, p.207-217
Main Authors: Cutello, Clara Alida, Walsh, Clare, Hanoch, Yaniv, Hellier, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Automobile driving
Bias
Driver behavior
Effectiveness
Evaluation
Hazard perception
Intervention
Optimism
Optimism bias
Perception
Risky-driving behaviours
Road safety
Studies
Traffic safety
Young drivers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•This is one of the few studies to assess two different interventions to reduce optimism bias in young novice drivers.•The results will be of interest to a wide spectrum of academics and non-academic audiences (police, policymakers, fire and rescue services).•The present results have clear implications for the design and implementation of preventive programs across the globe.•The results will be of interest to the general public as well as a range of media outlets. Optimism bias combined with sensation-seeking and risky driving have been proposed to be the main contributing factors to young drivers’ involvement in road traffic collisions. The present study aimed to evaluate how two brief interventions, one based on an unambiguous definition of “good” driving and the other on a hazard perception test, might reduce young drivers’ optimism bias. One hundred and twenty-eight university students were randomly allocated to one of three groups: standard definition, hazard perception or control. Measures evaluating optimism bias were completed before and after the intervention, and questions regarding their sensation-seeking and past risk-taking tendencies were asked at follow-up. Both brief interventions reduced optimism bias levels, but hazard perception had the strongest effect. The effectiveness of the two interventions also differed across individuals depending on their sensation-seeking and past risky driving tendencies. The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of brief interventions to reduce optimism bias.
ISSN:1369-8478
1873-5517
DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.013