Dual-task decrements in driving performance: The impact of task type, working memory, and the frequency of task performance

• Published in: Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2021-05, Vol.79, p.185-204
• Main Authors: Walker, Heather E.K., Eng, Rachel A., Trick, Lana M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automobile drivers; Automobile driving; Cellular phones; Distracted driving; Exposure; Independent variables; Interference; Memory; MP3; Practice; Short message service; Steering; Texting; Touch screens; Working memory; Young drivers
• ISSN: 1369-8478; 1873-5517
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.021

•Compensatory slowing, poor steering control when texting, using touchscreen console.•Individual differences significant covariates with task load, secondary task type.•Working memory predictive of speed compensation when texting.•Driving, task experience predict speed compensation, SDLP interference when texting.•Individual differences interact to predict speed compensation, SDLP interference. Driving while carrying out another (secondary) task interferes with performance, though the degree of interference may vary between tasks and individual drivers. In this study, we focused on two potentially interrelated individual difference variables that may play a role in determining dual-task interference: working memory capacity and the driver’s experience with the relevant secondary task. We used a driving simulator to measure interference, comparing single-task performance (driving alone) with driving performance during three secondary tasks: conversing on a handsfree cellphone, texting, and selecting a song on a touchscreen Mp3 player. Drivers also rated the difficulty of driving while carrying out each secondary task. For the individual difference variables, working memory was measured using the Operation Span test (OSPAN), and experience was assessed in terms of self-reported daily driving exposure and exposure to the relevant secondary tasks (frequency, duration). Overall, we found evidence of dual-task interference, though interference varied between tasks; the texting and Mp3 tasks produced significantly more interference than handsfree cellphone conversation. For the texting and Mp3 song selection tasks, interference was apparent in terms of increased steering variability, but for the Mp3 task there was also compensatory slowing, with drivers slowing down while carrying out the task. OSPAN performance and daily driving exposure were both covariates in predicting the amount of dual-task interference. However, our results suggest that in all but two cases, both involving the texting task, the effects of the OSPAN and the driving and secondary task exposure variables were independent rather than interrelated.