Loading…

DI-071 Linezolid use evaluation, pharmacy interventions and study of new optimisation points

BackgroundLinezolid is an antibiotic used for the treatment of serious infections caused by gram positive bacteria. Although first approved for skin infections, its use includes empiric treatment of infections usually caused by linezolid sensitive bacteria.PurposeTo describe, analyse and optimise th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2017-03, Vol.24 (Suppl 1), p.A145-A145
Main Authors: Izquierdo, I Ibarrola, España, Z Perez, Barrenechea, LM Mendarte, Aguirre, I Martinez, Santos, NM Pardo, Urtizberea, U Blazquez, Diaz, I Loizaga, Muzas, E Oñate, Armada, A Llona, Ibarreche, MJ Yurrebaso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundLinezolid is an antibiotic used for the treatment of serious infections caused by gram positive bacteria. Although first approved for skin infections, its use includes empiric treatment of infections usually caused by linezolid sensitive bacteria.PurposeTo describe, analyse and optimise the use of linezolid in a university hospital. To study new susceptible optimisation points.Material and methodsThis was a retrospective observational study (February–March 2016). Patient demographics and treatment related data were obtained from electronic clinical records. All linezolid prescriptions were reviewed, carrying out and registering pharmacy interventions. The results were compared with evidence observed in published guidelines and the literature.Results53 patients treated with linezolid were found (66 years (30–95)), 60% were men. Average treatment duration was 10.4 days (median 8 days, treatments longer than 90 days excluded). Indications were: 30% skin infections, 22.6% peritonitis, 18.8% pneumonia, 7.5% prosthesis infections and 7.5% meningitis. 51% of cases were unlabelled indications. 26.4% were empiric treatments (
ISSN:2047-9956
2047-9964
DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.318