Loading…

Differential effects of altered precipitation regimes on soil carbon cycles in arid versus humid terrestrial ecosystems

Changes in precipitation regimes have significant effects on soil carbon (C) cycles; however, these effects may vary in arid versus humid areas. Additionally, the corresponding details of soil C cycles in response to altered precipitation regimes have not been well documented. Here, a meta‐analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global change biology 2021-12, Vol.27 (24), p.6348-6362
Main Authors: Wang, Bin, Chen, Yali, Li, Yan, Zhang, Hui, Yue, Kai, Wang, Xingchang, Ma, Yuandan, Chen, Jian, Sun, Meng, Chen, Zhuo, Wu, Qiqian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Changes in precipitation regimes have significant effects on soil carbon (C) cycles; however, these effects may vary in arid versus humid areas. Additionally, the corresponding details of soil C cycles in response to altered precipitation regimes have not been well documented. Here, a meta‐analysis was performed using 845 pairwise observations (control vs. increased or decreased precipitation) from 214 published articles to quantify the responses of the input process of exogenous C, the contents of various forms of C in soil, and the soil‐atmosphere C fluxes relative to increased or decreased precipitation. The results showed that the effects of altered precipitation regimes did not differ between rainfall and snowfall. Increased precipitation significantly enhanced the soil C inputs, pools and outputs by 18.17%, 18.50%, and 21.04%, respectively, while decreased precipitation led to a significant decline in these soil C parameters by 10.18%, 9.96%, and 17.98%, respectively. The effects of increased precipitation on soil C cycles were more significant in arid areas (where mean annual precipitation, MAP
ISSN:1354-1013
1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.15875