Loading…

099 There is no consensus on mouthguard use across sports

BackgroundMouthguards are important for injury prevention in athletes. The American Dental Association (ADA) advocates the use of a properly fitted mouthguard in thirty sports to reduce the incidence and severity of sports-related dental injury and oro-facial trauma. Despite this, many athletes cite...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of sports medicine 2021-11, Vol.55 (Suppl 1), p.A40-A40
Main Authors: Ahmed, Irfan, James, Lee, Abbey, Joslin Lynsey, Shahyr, Shezad, Ian, Needleman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundMouthguards are important for injury prevention in athletes. The American Dental Association (ADA) advocates the use of a properly fitted mouthguard in thirty sports to reduce the incidence and severity of sports-related dental injury and oro-facial trauma. Despite this, many athletes cite a lack of formal guidance from individual sport governing bodies as a key reason for not wearing mouthguards.ObjectiveTo audit the current recommendations on mouthguard use, as advised by individual sport governing bodies. The audit standard is the current recommendations from the ADA.DesignAn online search was performed of each Olympic, international and national sport governing body. The websites were reviewed for medical guidance, and this was audited to determine whether mouthguards were ‘Mandated’, ‘Recommended’, ‘Optional’, ‘Not recommended’ or if there was ‘No guidance’. Where guidance was available, details on the type and fit of mouthguard recommended and mouthguard care/maintenance were recorded.SettingOlympic, international and national sports.PatientsAthletes competing across the thirty ADA ‘at-risk’ sports.Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors)N/AMain Outcome MeasurementsThe proportion of ‘at risk’ sports that have medical guidance on mouthguard use at the level of international governing bodies and national governing bodies. The number of sports with guidance on type, fit and maintenance were also assessed.Results10/30 ‘at risk’ sports issue medical guidance on mouthguard use at an international governing body level, of which five mandate usage. 11/30 sports issue guidance at a national governing body level, of which seven mandate usage. 5/30 sports have guidelines on mouthguard type or fit, and only 1/30 offered guidance on mouthguard care and maintenance.ConclusionsThere is a lack of clear guidance for athletes on mouthguard use and care consensus across sports is needed, which could contribute to enhanced protection of athlete health and wellbeing.
ISSN:0306-3674
1473-0480
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2021-IOC.92