Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis

A large literature suggests that the presence of refugees is associated with greater risk of conflict. We argue that the positive effects of hosting refugees on local conditions have been overlooked. Using global data from 1990 to 2018 on locations of refugee communities and civil conflict at the su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American political science review 2021-11, Vol.115 (4), p.1175-1196
Main Authors: ZHOU, YANG-YANG, SHAVER, ANDREW
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access to Health Care
Casualties
Community Relations
Conflict
Economic activity
Evidence
Humanitarian aid
Humanitarianism
Local conditions
Migration
Numbers
Political science
Population Distribution
Provinces
Refugees
Selection bias
Statistical Data
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043
container_end_page 1196
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1175
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 115
creator ZHOU, YANG-YANG
SHAVER, ANDREW
description A large literature suggests that the presence of refugees is associated with greater risk of conflict. We argue that the positive effects of hosting refugees on local conditions have been overlooked. Using global data from 1990 to 2018 on locations of refugee communities and civil conflict at the subnational level, we find no evidence that hosting refugees increases the likelihood of new conflict, prolongs existing conflict, or raises the number of violent events or casualties. Furthermore, we explore conditions where provinces are likely to experience substantively large decreases in conflict risk due to increased development. Analysis examining nighttime lights as a measure of development, coupled with expert interviews, support our claim. To address the possibility of selection bias, we use placebo tests and matching. Our research challenges assertions that refugees are security risks. Instead, we show that in many cases, hosting refugees can encourage local development and even conflict reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0003055421000502
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2607244174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607244174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1Lw0AUXETBWv0B3hY8R9_bj2zWWwm1CgWh1XPYJLt1S5qt2UTsvzdBb17ezDDD470h5BbhHgHVwxYAOEgpGI5MAjsjM5RcJVILfk5mk51M_iW5inE_SkDIZmS7sfbbHHzr2x3tPyxdOmerngZHN9YNO2sjDS3N_ZdvaB5a1_iqf6QLumpCaRq6HcrW9D60I1-M4xR9vCYXzjTR3vzhnLw_Ld_y52T9unrJF-ukYkr3iVJSp1nlmKslE3UGrkTkMjWZUkaxWthMjC_pUmuha5RljTwD1MhTW6cg-Jzc_e49duFzsLEv9mHoxiNiwVJQTAhUUwp_U1UXYuysK46dP5juVCAUU3fFv-74D6WUXoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607244174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>ZHOU, YANG-YANG ; SHAVER, ANDREW</creator><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YANG-YANG ; SHAVER, ANDREW</creatorcontrib><description>A large literature suggests that the presence of refugees is associated with greater risk of conflict. We argue that the positive effects of hosting refugees on local conditions have been overlooked. Using global data from 1990 to 2018 on locations of refugee communities and civil conflict at the subnational level, we find no evidence that hosting refugees increases the likelihood of new conflict, prolongs existing conflict, or raises the number of violent events or casualties. Furthermore, we explore conditions where provinces are likely to experience substantively large decreases in conflict risk due to increased development. Analysis examining nighttime lights as a measure of development, coupled with expert interviews, support our claim. To address the possibility of selection bias, we use placebo tests and matching. Our research challenges assertions that refugees are security risks. Instead, we show that in many cases, hosting refugees can encourage local development and even conflict reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055421000502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Access to Health Care ; Casualties ; Community Relations ; Conflict ; Economic activity ; Evidence ; Humanitarian aid ; Humanitarianism ; Local conditions ; Migration ; Numbers ; Political science ; Population Distribution ; Provinces ; Refugees ; Selection bias ; Statistical Data</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2021-11, Vol.115 (4), p.1175-1196</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0309-4252 ; 0000-0002-4445-9273</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2607244174/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2607244174?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12845,12847,21378,21387,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,33877,33985,36060,43733,43880,43948,44363,74221,74397,74468,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YANG-YANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAVER, ANDREW</creatorcontrib><title>Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis</title><title>The American political science review</title><description>A large literature suggests that the presence of refugees is associated with greater risk of conflict. We argue that the positive effects of hosting refugees on local conditions have been overlooked. Using global data from 1990 to 2018 on locations of refugee communities and civil conflict at the subnational level, we find no evidence that hosting refugees increases the likelihood of new conflict, prolongs existing conflict, or raises the number of violent events or casualties. Furthermore, we explore conditions where provinces are likely to experience substantively large decreases in conflict risk due to increased development. Analysis examining nighttime lights as a measure of development, coupled with expert interviews, support our claim. To address the possibility of selection bias, we use placebo tests and matching. Our research challenges assertions that refugees are security risks. Instead, we show that in many cases, hosting refugees can encourage local development and even conflict reduction.</description><subject>Access to Health Care</subject><subject>Casualties</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Humanitarian aid</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>Local conditions</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Numbers</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Population Distribution</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Selection bias</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1Lw0AUXETBWv0B3hY8R9_bj2zWWwm1CgWh1XPYJLt1S5qt2UTsvzdBb17ezDDD470h5BbhHgHVwxYAOEgpGI5MAjsjM5RcJVILfk5mk51M_iW5inE_SkDIZmS7sfbbHHzr2x3tPyxdOmerngZHN9YNO2sjDS3N_ZdvaB5a1_iqf6QLumpCaRq6HcrW9D60I1-M4xR9vCYXzjTR3vzhnLw_Ld_y52T9unrJF-ukYkr3iVJSp1nlmKslE3UGrkTkMjWZUkaxWthMjC_pUmuha5RljTwD1MhTW6cg-Jzc_e49duFzsLEv9mHoxiNiwVJQTAhUUwp_U1UXYuysK46dP5juVCAUU3fFv-74D6WUXoM</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>ZHOU, YANG-YANG</creator><creator>SHAVER, ANDREW</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-4252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-9273</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis</title><author>ZHOU, YANG-YANG ; SHAVER, ANDREW</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access to Health Care</topic><topic>Casualties</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Humanitarian aid</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>Local conditions</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Numbers</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Population Distribution</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Selection bias</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, YANG-YANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAVER, ANDREW</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZHOU, YANG-YANG</au><au>SHAVER, ANDREW</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1196</epage><pages>1175-1196</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>A large literature suggests that the presence of refugees is associated with greater risk of conflict. We argue that the positive effects of hosting refugees on local conditions have been overlooked. Using global data from 1990 to 2018 on locations of refugee communities and civil conflict at the subnational level, we find no evidence that hosting refugees increases the likelihood of new conflict, prolongs existing conflict, or raises the number of violent events or casualties. Furthermore, we explore conditions where provinces are likely to experience substantively large decreases in conflict risk due to increased development. Analysis examining nighttime lights as a measure of development, coupled with expert interviews, support our claim. To address the possibility of selection bias, we use placebo tests and matching. Our research challenges assertions that refugees are security risks. Instead, we show that in many cases, hosting refugees can encourage local development and even conflict reduction.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055421000502</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-4252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-9273</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 2021-11, Vol.115 (4), p.1175-1196
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2607244174
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM global; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
subjects Access to Health Care
Casualties
Community Relations
Conflict
Economic activity
Evidence
Humanitarian aid
Humanitarianism
Local conditions
Migration
Numbers
Political science
Population Distribution
Provinces
Refugees
Selection bias
Statistical Data
title Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A11%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reexamining%20the%20Effect%20of%20Refugees%20on%20Civil%20Conflict:%20A%20Global%20Subnational%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=ZHOU,%20YANG-YANG&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1196&rft.pages=1175-1196&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055421000502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2607244174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-775968cf2fd524d80fb11356a877a72d4e843059b9949d15bd138019136ed6043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607244174&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true