Bill Text and Agenda Control in the US Congress

The study of agenda power has largely been the study of negative agenda power. But standard measures of negative agenda power are insufficient to measure the majority’s agenda choices: they only consider a small proportion of bills, only detail how often negative agenda power fails (rather than succ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of politics 2022-01, Vol.84 (1), p.335-350
Main Author: Ballard, Andrew O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agenda
Decision making
Interest groups
Legislatures
Political parties
Power
Preferences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study of agenda power has largely been the study of negative agenda power. But standard measures of negative agenda power are insufficient to measure the majority’s agenda choices: they only consider a small proportion of bills, only detail how often negative agenda power fails (rather than succeeds), and cannot help us understand positive agenda power. To understand the incentives and strategies of agenda decision-making, then, we must know about members’ preferences on all bills. I develop an approach to estimate members’ preferences on all bills, by generating quantitative characterizations of the policy content in each bill. I use the resulting estimates to examine both positive and negative agenda power using all bills and to directly compare levels of agenda power between chambers of the US Congress. While I find similarly strong negative agenda control in both chambers, I find substantially stronger positive agenda control in the House than the Senate.
ISSN:0022-3816
1468-2508
DOI:10.1086/714928