Dehydration mechanisms in electrohydrodynamic drying of plant-based foods

• Published in: Food and bioproducts processing 2022-01, Vol.131, p.202-216
• Main Authors: Iranshahi, Kamran, Onwude, Daniel I., Martynenko, Alex, Defraeye, Thijs
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biodegradability; Biological materials; Cell membranes; Dehydration; Diffusion; Drying; EHD; Electrocapillary flow; Electrohydrodynamics; Electroosmosis; Electroporation; Energy efficiency; Food; Food availability; Food plants; Food preservation; Food processing; Foods; Fruits; Herbal medicine; Mass transfer; Medicinal plants; Moisture removal; Optimization; Physics; Plant-based foods; Plants (botany); Porous materials; Theoretical modeling; Thermocapillary flow; Water flow; Water transport
• ISSN: 0960-3085; 1744-3571
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.11.009

•Seven mass transfer mechanisms simultaneously happen during EHD drying.•Water transport mechanisms can be described with simple mathematical models.•Increasing the voltage increases the mass transfer mechanisms exponentially.•Operating in AC instead of DC voltage can improve the drying rate. Electrohydrodynamic drying (EHDD) is an energy-efficient and non-thermal technique for dehydrating heat-sensitive biological materials, like fruits, vegetables, or medicinal plants. Although this method has been studied for more than three decades, still little is known about the relative contribution of the different dehydration mechanisms in EHDD. An accurate understanding of the impact of the different EHD-driven mass transfer processes inside the food and its surrounding air is essential for a targeted future optimization and successful upscaling of EHDD technology. Examples of these dehydration mechanisms are convective moisture removal, electroporation of the cell membrane, or electro-osmotic flow in the fruit. In this modeling study, we first identify possible dehydration mechanisms for mass transfer during the EHDD process of plant-based food materials. Using available theoretical models, we then estimate the relative contribution of each dehydration mechanism to the overall mass transfer during the constant rate period and rank them based on their contribution. We show that convective dehydration by ionic wind is the dominant dehydration mechanism, with a contribution of about 93% to the overall water flux for a capillary-porous material. Cell-membrane electroporation is the second important driving force that increases the contribution of the transmembrane water flow to about 6.5% of the total mass flux in fruit tissue. The contribution of all the other water transport mechanisms is only 0.5%. These insights provide a stepping stone towards developing a full physics-based model of the dehydration process by EHD, including the falling rate period.