Survivor narratives of the Oklahoma City bombing: The story over time

The growing disaster psychiatry research literature has focused on posttraumatic stress disorder, producing little insight into subjective disaster experience. Qualitative research, especially narrative analysis, may provide in‐depth exploration of individual disaster experience and efforts to make...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of contingencies and crisis management 2022-03, Vol.30 (1), p.102-111
Main Authors: Dang, Christine M., Lee, Min Hyung, Nguyen, Anna Marie, Diduck, Alexandra, Villareal, Ariel, Simic, Zorica, Pollio, David E., North, Carol S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bombing
disaster
Disasters
Injuries
Interviews
Meaning
mental health
narrative
Narratives
oklahoma city bombing
Post traumatic stress disorder
Psychiatry
qualitative analysis
Qualitative research
Survivor
Terrorism
Time
trauma
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The growing disaster psychiatry research literature has focused on posttraumatic stress disorder, producing little insight into subjective disaster experience. Qualitative research, especially narrative analysis, may provide in‐depth exploration of individual disaster experience and efforts to make meaning of it. Disaster narratives were collected from a random sample of 182 Oklahoma City bombing survivors 6 months after the disaster and again from 141 survivors nearly 1 year later. These narratives were examined for the evolution of recurring themes and their content over time. The content followed a natural time structure, encompassing phases of the bombing experience that were organized into three overarching categories containing individual themes: (a) experience of the bomb blast including themes of sensory experience and cognitions, (b) immediate aftermath including themes of structural damage, helping others, escape and physical injury, and (c) later reflections. The general content and focus of the narratives changed minimally between the baseline and follow‐up interviews, but there was considerable compression of detail in the follow‐up interviews. Narrative details demonstrating consistency across time may represent the most salient meaning derived from the disaster experience. These findings have potential applicability to therapeutic interventions for working with survivors of terrorism and other disasters.
ISSN:0966-0879
1468-5973
DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.12357