Loading…

A Tale of Two Supervisors: Compliance with Risk Disclosure Regulation in the Banking Sector

ABSTRACT We examine how the presence of multiple supervisory agencies affects firm‐level compliance in form and substance with disclosure regulations. This analysis is important because coordination problems among regulators are frequently present in practice but often overlooked in academic researc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contemporary accounting research 2022-03, Vol.39 (1), p.498-536
Main Authors: Bischof, Jannis, Daske, Holger, Elfers, Ferdinand, Hail, Luzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT We examine how the presence of multiple supervisory agencies affects firm‐level compliance in form and substance with disclosure regulations. This analysis is important because coordination problems among regulators are frequently present in practice but often overlooked in academic research. We exploit that banks are subject to equivalent risk disclosure rules under securities laws (IFRS 7) and banking regulation (Pillar 3 of the Basel II Accord) but that different regulators start enforcing the rules at different points in time. We find that banks substantially increase their formal risk disclosures upon the adoption of Pillar 3 even if they already had to comply with the same requirements under IFRS 7. The effects are stronger if the central bank is responsible for bank supervision and bank regulators are equipped with more supervisory resources, but are less pronounced if the securities market regulator is an independent entity. In turn, banks facing more market pressures are more compliant with the rules. We further find persistent liquidity benefits of the increased risk disclosures but only after Pillar 3 became effective and its compliance was enforced by the banking regulator. Our results suggest that formal and material compliance with risk disclosure regulation are a function of both the resources of the supervisory agency and its incentive alignment with the regulated firms. In our setting, the banking regulator seems more effective in fulfilling this role. RÉSUMÉ Un conte de deux superviseurs : conformité avec la réglementation relative à la divulgation des risques dans le secteur bancaire Nous examinons de quelle façon la présence de plusieurs organismes de surveillance influence la conformité des entreprises avec la réglementation relative à la communication de l'information, tant sur le plan de la forme que sur le fond. Cette analyse est importante, car les problèmes de coordination entre les organismes de réglementation sont fréquents dans la pratique, mais sont souvent mis de côté dans le cadre de la recherche universitaire. Nous faisons valoir que les banques sont assujetties à des règles équivalentes en matière de divulgation des risques en vertu des lois sur les valeurs mobilières (IFRS 7) et de la réglementation du secteur bancaire (pilier 3 de l'accord de Bâle II), mais que les divers organismes de réglementation appliquent les règles à différents moments. Nous établissons que les banques augmentent de façon importante leurs
ISSN:0823-9150
1911-3846
DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12715