Loading…

Women, Peace and Security governance in the Asia–Pacific: a multi-scalar field of discourse and practice

This article investigates how the Women, Peace and Security agenda has developed in Asia–Pacific region, including in ASEAN and countries such as Bangladesh, Indonesia and South Korea. They find an emerging field of multi-scalar discourse and practice that has potential for both convergence and cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International affairs (London) 2022-03, Vol.98 (2), p.727-746
Main Authors: Martel, Stéphanie, Mustapha, Jennifer, Sharma, Sarah E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article investigates how the Women, Peace and Security agenda has developed in Asia–Pacific region, including in ASEAN and countries such as Bangladesh, Indonesia and South Korea. They find an emerging field of multi-scalar discourse and practice that has potential for both convergence and contestation, and highlight the complex dynamics of WPS engagement in local settings. Abstract The UN's Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda is now over 20 years old, yet much of the Asia–Pacific has been slow to engage in formalized WPS work at national and regional scales. This article examines the relatively recent development of official WPS national action plans by Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Timor-Leste, alongside mounting collective efforts towards WPS governance by regional organizations like ASEAN. We demonstrate the existence of an emerging multi-scalar field of WPS discourse and practice in the Asia–Pacific, which is still in its formative stages and carries the potential for both convergence and contestation as actors work to navigate diverse approaches to WPS governance along various ‘tracks’. This article also points to the limitations of a rigidly formalized elite-driven WPS agenda that neglects well-established communities of practice in the Asia–Pacific. Ultimately, more attention needs to be paid to the complex dynamics that shape the ongoing postcolonial encounters between the broader WPS agenda and the localized historical and discursive contexts of regional WPS governance.
ISSN:0020-5850
1468-2346
DOI:10.1093/ia/iiab228