Sulfur fertilization strategy affects grass yield, nitrogen uptake, and nitrate leaching: A field lysimeter study

• Published in: Journal of plant nutrition and soil science 2022-04, Vol.185 (2), p.209-220
• Main Authors: Aspel, Claire, Murphy, Paul N. C., McLaughlin, Michael J., Forrestal, Patrick J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ammonium; Ammonium nitrate; Ammonium sulfate; Calcium nitrate; Calcium sulfate; Cattle manure; Climate action; Climate change; Drinking water; Emissions; Farming systems; Fertilization; Fertilizers; Grasslands; Hydroxyapatite; Leachates; Leaching; Nitrates; Nitrogen; nitrogen use efficiency; Nutrition; Optimization; organic manure; S deficient soils; Sandy loam; Slurries; Sulfates; Sulfur; Sulfur dioxide; water quality
• ISSN: 1436-8730; 1522-2624
• DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202100133

Background Globally and at the European Union level there are mounting concerns regarding nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural systems and pressure to reduce N losses to water and air. Suboptimal plant sulfur (S) availability can reduce plant N efficiency and thereby increase N loss potential. Climate change action demands lower sulfur dioxide emissions thus S deposition levels are at an all‐time low. Aims The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine the potential for adequate S nutrition to increase grassland yield and N efficiency, (2) determine if alleviating S deficiency reduces nitrate leaching, and (3) evaluate a number of strategies for applying S including the use of cattle slurry. Methods This work was completed using a free‐draining sandy loam grassland lysimeter facility. There were six treatments using calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), CAN + calcium sulfate (CAN+S), ammonium sulfate + CAN (AS+CAN), and slurry (Slurry+CAN and Slurry+CAN+S, respectively) to deliver S strategies. The yield, plant N and S uptake, and nitrate and sulfate leachate were measured to compare treatments. Results Application of mineral S fertilizer increased yields significantly (up to 2,907 kg ha–1) and increased apparent fertilizer nitrogen recovery from 39% to 47–49%. Alleviating S deficiency also significantly decreased nitrate leaching to levels not differing significantly from the control. There was a reduction of 46% in nitrate leaching with the addition of mineral S (CAN+S and AS+CAN) compared to N only. The nitrate concentration standard for drinking water was not breached for treatments that included S (6.6–11 mg NO3–‐N L–1), whereas it was breached for those without S (23–40 mg NO3–‐N L–1). The S applied in the slurry treatment was not adequate (9 kg S ha–1) to meet plant requirements. Conclusion This study provides evidence that optimization of S nutrition has the potential to deliver large agronomic and environmental benefits along with potential as a nitrate leaching migration strategy on S‐deficient soils.