Optimal retrofit solutions considering thermal comfort and intervention costs for the Mediterranean social housing stock

• Published in: Energy and buildings 2022-03, Vol.259, p.111915, Article 111915
• Main Authors: Calama-González, Carmen María, Symonds, Phil, León-Rodríguez, Ángel Luis, Suárez, Rafael
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Building stock modelling; Costs; Energy demand; Genetic algorithms; Housing; Multi-objective analysis; Optimisation; Overheating; Public housing; Retrofitting; Sensitivity analysis; Social housing; Supercooling; Thermal comfort
• ISSN: 0378-7788; 1872-6178
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111915

•A bottom-up approach is applied through calibrated parameterised stock energy models.•Information from a public database is incorporated into energy dynamic models.•Retrofit solutions are proposed optimising thermal comfort and investment costs.•Four Mediterranean climatic areas of southern Spain are assessed.•Interactive results can be easily accessed by stakeholders and the general public. There is an impending need to retrofit the existing social housing stock to improve thermal comfort and to reduce energy demand. This research proposes calibrated building stock models to assess thermal comfort of the social housing stock of southern Spain (Mediterranean area). Several retrofit strategies are optimised using a genetic algorithm to obtain the best retrofit solutions, considering three objectives: annual overheating hours (%), annual undercooling hours (%) and investment costs (€/m2). Results are shown for four different climatic areas in southern Spain. This study finds that it is possible to retrofit the aforementioned stock considering investment costs from approximately 20–200 €/m2. The percentage of improvements for each climatic area are as follows: in Sevilla (B4 climatic area), investments costs up to 50 €/m2 led to 40% and 20% annual overheating and undercooling hours. In Cádiz, (A3 climatic area), 15% and 22% overheating and undercooling hours were achieved with medium-cost solutions (50–100 €/m2). In Almería (A4 climatic area), also medium-cost strategies reported approximately 15% and 30% overheating and undercooling hours. In Granada (C3 climatic area), 15% and 38% overheating and undercooling hours were obtained with medium-cost measures. Yet, applying high-cost solutions (100–200 €/m2) only significantly improved thermal comfort in Almería and Sevilla.