Loading…
Digital footprint wrangling: are analytics used for better or worse? A concurrent mixed methods research on the commercial (ab)use of dataveillance
Despite the introduction in the European Union (EU) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May-18, a growing opposition is noticed against the allegedly hazardous commercial exploitation of the consumer’s digital footprints. A “data autocracy” regime is asserted to be distorting the inf...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of marketing analytics 2022-09, Vol.10 (3), p.187-206 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Despite the introduction in the European Union (EU) of the
General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) in May-18, a growing opposition is noticed against the allegedly hazardous commercial exploitation of the consumer’s
digital footprints.
A “data autocracy” regime is asserted to be distorting the information to the consumer and bias the ability to take informed free choices. Consequently, companies face nowadays a great data governance challenge, i.e. to restore the consumer’s positive sentiment while continuing to explore Big Data. Hence, we have conducted a multi-method enquiry with
foci
on the Danish market covering the topic of digital footprint’s awareness. This was fashioned with a descriptive-exploratory research purpose, to understand the sentiment (perception) and the behavior (action) of the data-owners and data-brokers surrounding the dataveillance over personal lives. Results confirmed a generalized inability to minimize risks of data misuse. A new insight for Marketeers is the willingness of some respondents to pay for security services and thus safeguard their privacy (disbelieved of the regulatory compliance system). A perception-behavior gap is noticed on the distress with the exposure of personal information and the paradoxical low self-defensiveness. Likewise, data-brokers admit the deliberate use (perception) of imitation strategies (e.g. hyper-targeting; algorithmic refinement; and, predictive modeling) for maintaining a competitive parity with other firms, which contrasts with the institutional isomorphism (inaction) to interrupt them. Given the relevance of this discussion (and our conclusions) for policy-making, managers (inclusively marketing professionals) and citizens, is recommended the deepening of this research line in the region, especially in Nordic countries. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3318 2050-3326 |
DOI: | 10.1057/s41270-021-00144-5 |