Loading…

Digital footprint wrangling: are analytics used for better or worse? A concurrent mixed methods research on the commercial (ab)use of dataveillance

Despite the introduction in the European Union (EU) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May-18, a growing opposition is noticed against the allegedly hazardous commercial exploitation of the consumer’s digital footprints. A “data autocracy” regime is asserted to be distorting the inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marketing analytics 2022-09, Vol.10 (3), p.187-206
Main Authors: Abrantes, Bruno F., Ostergaard, Klaus Grue
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the introduction in the European Union (EU) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May-18, a growing opposition is noticed against the allegedly hazardous commercial exploitation of the consumer’s digital footprints. A “data autocracy” regime is asserted to be distorting the information to the consumer and bias the ability to take informed free choices. Consequently, companies face nowadays a great data governance challenge, i.e. to restore the consumer’s positive sentiment while continuing to explore Big Data. Hence, we have conducted a multi-method enquiry with foci on the Danish market covering the topic of digital footprint’s awareness. This was fashioned with a descriptive-exploratory research purpose, to understand the sentiment (perception) and the behavior (action) of the data-owners and data-brokers surrounding the dataveillance over personal lives. Results confirmed a generalized inability to minimize risks of data misuse. A new insight for Marketeers is the willingness of some respondents to pay for security services and thus safeguard their privacy (disbelieved of the regulatory compliance system). A perception-behavior gap is noticed on the distress with the exposure of personal information and the paradoxical low self-defensiveness. Likewise, data-brokers admit the deliberate use (perception) of imitation strategies (e.g. hyper-targeting; algorithmic refinement; and, predictive modeling) for maintaining a competitive parity with other firms, which contrasts with the institutional isomorphism (inaction) to interrupt them. Given the relevance of this discussion (and our conclusions) for policy-making, managers (inclusively marketing professionals) and citizens, is recommended the deepening of this research line in the region, especially in Nordic countries.
ISSN:2050-3318
2050-3326
DOI:10.1057/s41270-021-00144-5