Loading…
Reply to Comment on “On the Estimation of Potential Evaporation Under Wet and Dry Conditions” by Jozsef Szilagyi
We appreciate Dr. Szilagyi's interest in our work of recovering surface temperature and evaporation to a “hypothetical” saturated condition. Dr. Szilagyi criticized our approach by arguing that the recovered surface temperature is unphysically low. Here we reply to Dr. Szilagyi's concern b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water resources research 2022-10, Vol.58 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We appreciate Dr. Szilagyi's interest in our work of recovering surface temperature and evaporation to a “hypothetical” saturated condition. Dr. Szilagyi criticized our approach by arguing that the recovered surface temperature is unphysically low. Here we reply to Dr. Szilagyi's concern by showing that our recovered surface temperature is not unphysically low and is physically attainable. In addition, our approach strictly follows the definition of potential evaporation by Wilfried Brutsaert (2015).
Key Points
The recovered surface temperature using the maximum evaporation approach is physically attainable
Allowing net radiation vary with surface wetting/drying is more universally valid
The maximum evaporation approach best follows the definition of potential evaporation by Wilfried Brutsaert (2015) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2022WR033674 |