Loading…
A Noninferiority Margin for Acne Lesion Counts
When comparing different active treatments, a noninferiority—also called one-sided equivalence—study design is used. This study design requires the definition of a noninferiority margin, the threshold value of clinical relevance. At present, a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points is convent...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug information journal 2008-11, Vol.42 (6), p.607-615 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | When comparing different active treatments, a noninferiority—also called one-sided equivalence—study design is used. This study design requires the definition of a noninferiority margin, the threshold value of clinical relevance. At present, a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points is conventionally used for the change in acne lesion counts, but it lacks empirical validation.
We analyzed the data of 4,081 patients with moderate to severe facial acne. The treatment effect was recorded by the investigator as the relative change in lesion counts from baseline (objective assessment). At the end of the treatment period, patients rated themselves as having their acne condition improved, unchanged, or worsened (subjective assessment). We compared the changes in lesion counts with the patients' self-assessment to derive an empirically validated noninferiority margin.
We found that an empirically validated noninferiority margin of 10–15 percentage points for facial acne lesion counts is appropriate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-4790 0092-8615 2168-4804 2164-9200 |
DOI: | 10.1177/009286150804200608 |