Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Models

Large-scale neural network models combining text and images have made incredible progress in recent years. However, it remains an open question to what extent such models encode compositional representations of the concepts over which they operate, such as correctly identifying "red cube"...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-08
Main Authors: Lewis, Martha, Nayak, Nihal V, Yu, Peilin, Yu, Qinan, Merullo, Jack, Bach, Stephen H, Pavlick, Ellie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Scale models
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Large-scale neural network models combining text and images have made incredible progress in recent years. However, it remains an open question to what extent such models encode compositional representations of the concepts over which they operate, such as correctly identifying "red cube" by reasoning over the constituents "red" and "cube". In this work, we focus on the ability of a large pretrained vision and language model (CLIP) to encode compositional concepts and to bind variables in a structure-sensitive way (e.g., differentiating "cube behind sphere" from "sphere behind cube"). To inspect the performance of CLIP, we compare several architectures from research on compositional distributional semantics models (CDSMs), a line of research that attempts to implement traditional compositional linguistic structures within embedding spaces. We benchmark them on three synthetic datasets - single-object, two-object, and relational - designed to test concept binding. We find that CLIP can compose concepts in a single-object setting, but in situations where concept binding is needed, performance drops dramatically. At the same time, CDSMs also perform poorly, with best performance at chance level.
ISSN:2331-8422