Loading…

Benchmarking the quadrupolar coupling tensor for chlorine to probe weak-bonding interactions

Rotational spectroscopy relies on quantum chemical calculations to interpret observed spectra. Among the most challenging molecules to assign are those with additional angular momenta coupling to the rotation, contributing to the complexity of the spectrum. This benchmark study of computational meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP 2023-01, Vol.25 (3), p.242-2429
Main Authors: Dohmen, Robin, Fedosov, Denis, Obenchain, Daniel A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rotational spectroscopy relies on quantum chemical calculations to interpret observed spectra. Among the most challenging molecules to assign are those with additional angular momenta coupling to the rotation, contributing to the complexity of the spectrum. This benchmark study of computational methods commonly used by rotational spectroscopists targets the nuclear quadrupole coupling constants of chlorine containing molecules and the geometry of its complexes and clusters. For each method, the quality of both structural and electronic parameter predictions is compared with the experimental values. Ab initio methods are found to perform best overall in predicting both the geometry of the complexes and the coupling constants of chlorine with moderate computational cost. This cost can be reduced by combining these methods with density functional theory structure optimization, which still yields adequate predictions. This work constitutes a first step in expanding Bailey's quadrupole coupling data set to encompass molecular clusters. [W. C. Bailey, Calculation of Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling Constants in Gaseous State Molecule, 2019, https://nqcc.wcbailey.net/ ] Rotational spectroscopy relies on quantum chemical calculations to interpret hyperfine splitting.
ISSN:1463-9076
1463-9084
DOI:10.1039/d2cp04067k