Novel approach to predicting the spatial distribution of the hydraulic conductivity of a rock mass using convolutional neural networks

Characterizing the spatial distributions of the hydraulic conductivity of a rock mass is important in geoscience and engineering disciplines. In this paper, the architecture of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed to predict the spatial distributions of hydraulic conductivity based on li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of engineering geology and hydrogeology 2023-02, Vol.56 (1), p.1
Main Authors: He, Mingming, Zhou, Jiapei, Li, Panfeng, Yang, Beibei, Wang, Haoteng, Wang, Jing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial neural networks
Borehole geophysics
Boreholes
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Depth
Engineering geology
Geohazards
Geophysics
Groundwater modelling
Hydraulic conductivity
Hydraulics
Hydrogeology
Landslides
Modelling
Neural networks
Rock masses
Rock mechanics
Rocks
Spatial distribution
Unloading
Weathering
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Characterizing the spatial distributions of the hydraulic conductivity of a rock mass is important in geoscience and engineering disciplines. In this paper, the architecture of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed to predict the spatial distributions of hydraulic conductivity based on limited geological factors. The performance of the CNN model is evaluated using the new data of hydraulic conductivity. A comparative study with the empirical method is performed to validate the reliability of the CNN model. The effect of weathering and unloading on the spatial distributions of hydraulic conductivity is studied using the CNN model. The results show that the hydraulic conductivity predicted by the CNN model is within an error range of 5% compared to Lugeon borehole tests. The predictive accuracy of the CNN method is higher than the estimations made using empirical relationships. The spatial distributions of hydraulic conductivity v. depth can be divided into three stages. In the first stage, the hydraulic conductivity is slightly reduced with increasing depth. Increasing in the depth range of 300–600 m (second stage), the hydraulic conductivity is slightly reduced as a function of the lower degree of weathering. In the final stage, the hydraulic conductivity is not changed by weathering and values gradually converge to a constant as depth increases.
ISSN:1470-9236
2041-4803
DOI:10.1144/qjegh2021-169