Loading…

Effect of long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on hemoglobin levels at the initiation of dialysis

BackgroundThe goal of the present study was to explore the differences in effects between erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) types on hemoglobin (Hb) level at the initiation of maintenance dialysis.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. From January 2006 to October 2012, 2920 patients with end...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Renal replacement therapy 2016-02, Vol.2 (1), p.12, Article 12
Main Authors: Asakawa, Takasuke, Komatsu, Yasuhiro, Ando, Ryoichi, Joki, Nobuhiko, Tanaka, Yuri, Iwasaki, Masaki, Hase, Hiroki, Ikeda, Masato, Inaguma, Daijo, Sakaguchi, Toshifumi, Shinoda, Toshio, Koiwa, Fumihiko, Negi, Shigeo, Yamaka, Toshihiko, Shigematsu, Takashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundThe goal of the present study was to explore the differences in effects between erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) types on hemoglobin (Hb) level at the initiation of maintenance dialysis.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. From January 2006 to October 2012, 2920 patients with end-stage kidney disease commenced hemodialysis (HD) at nine participating hospitals. The criteria for exclusion from the database were (1) presence of cancer or gastrointestinal bleeding and (2) serum C-reactive protein ≥0.3 mg/dL. A total of 1263 patients were entered into the final database. We explored the association of yearly trend of Hb level just before the first HD session with the different types of ESA in the predialysis period.ResultsDuring the 7-year study period, patients’ Hb levels at the initiation of dialysis dramatically increased from 8.6 to 9.1 g/dL. Parallel to this increase, the use of long-acting ESA also increased from 0 to 80 %. A higher level of Hb was confirmed in the long-acting ESA group compared with the short-acting group (9.5 vs. 8.7 g/dL, P 
ISSN:2059-1381
2059-1381
DOI:10.1186/s41100-016-0018-2