An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transboundary and emerging diseases 2023-03, Vol.2023, p.1-5
Main Authors: Asin, Javier, Moriarty, Megan E., Mikolon, Andrea B., Clifford, Deana L., Rejmanek, Daniel, Uzal, Francisco A., Crossley, Beate M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age groups
Carcasses
Contamination
Diagnostic systems
Environmental risk
Epidemics
Feces
Hemorrhagic disease
Laboratories
Liver
Normal distribution
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease
Rabbits
Rectum
Viruses
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usually seek alternate diagnostic approaches that permit simpler and faster sample collection with less risk of environmental contamination; there is also a necessity for a sample type that can be collected from live animals. Therefore, the goal of this study was to optimize and evaluate an RT-qPCR assay on rectal swabs collected from a group of carcasses of leporids of different species that were submitted to a VDL during an RHDV2 outbreak. A total of 130 carcasses were tested both by liver tissue and rectal swab RT-qPCR. The results of the liver samples were considered the gold standard, and 73 carcasses tested positive and 57 carcasses tested negative in liver. Out of the 73 liver RT-qPCR-positive carcasses, 64 tested positive and 9 tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. All 57 liver RT-qPCR-negative carcasses tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the rectal RT-qPCR were 88% and 100%, respectively, most likely due to significantly (p
ISSN:1865-1674
1865-1682
DOI:10.1155/2023/1869692