Loading…
An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usua...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transboundary and emerging diseases 2023-03, Vol.2023, p.1-5 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3 |
container_end_page | 5 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Transboundary and emerging diseases |
container_volume | 2023 |
creator | Asin, Javier Moriarty, Megan E. Mikolon, Andrea B. Clifford, Deana L. Rejmanek, Daniel Uzal, Francisco A. Crossley, Beate M. |
description | Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usually seek alternate diagnostic approaches that permit simpler and faster sample collection with less risk of environmental contamination; there is also a necessity for a sample type that can be collected from live animals. Therefore, the goal of this study was to optimize and evaluate an RT-qPCR assay on rectal swabs collected from a group of carcasses of leporids of different species that were submitted to a VDL during an RHDV2 outbreak. A total of 130 carcasses were tested both by liver tissue and rectal swab RT-qPCR. The results of the liver samples were considered the gold standard, and 73 carcasses tested positive and 57 carcasses tested negative in liver. Out of the 73 liver RT-qPCR-positive carcasses, 64 tested positive and 9 tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. All 57 liver RT-qPCR-negative carcasses tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the rectal RT-qPCR were 88% and 100%, respectively, most likely due to significantly (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2023/1869692 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2802492081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802492081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd3_oAXvNS6fLRJeznqx4ShUqe3JW0Sl7m1W9Iy9u_N2PDSq_dweDiH9yB0TfA9IUkyopiyEUl5xjN6ggZBJRHhKT390yI-RxfeLzDmOOPJAP2MGyhm0eY9L2DsvdyBce0KCl13cgkfW1l5MK2Dbq7hQXfBtm0DrYFCVpXtYKJXrXNz-W1reLBeS6_hy7reAwXbwKvseheC8uD7S3Rm5NLrq-Mdos-nx1k-iaZvzy_5eBrVjIkuYiqtY50xkSimBVaCSZXUirE0_FgpLDlhRjHFDEkqg0UcG40zxaURouZSsSG6OeSuXbvpte_KRdu7JlSWNMU0zihOSaDuDlTtWu-dNuXa2ZV0u5Lgcj9nuZ-zPM4Z8NsDPreNklv7P_0LcYNzRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802492081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Asin, Javier ; Moriarty, Megan E. ; Mikolon, Andrea B. ; Clifford, Deana L. ; Rejmanek, Daniel ; Uzal, Francisco A. ; Crossley, Beate M.</creator><contributor>Simulundu, Edgar ; Edgar Simulundu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Asin, Javier ; Moriarty, Megan E. ; Mikolon, Andrea B. ; Clifford, Deana L. ; Rejmanek, Daniel ; Uzal, Francisco A. ; Crossley, Beate M. ; Simulundu, Edgar ; Edgar Simulundu</creatorcontrib><description>Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usually seek alternate diagnostic approaches that permit simpler and faster sample collection with less risk of environmental contamination; there is also a necessity for a sample type that can be collected from live animals. Therefore, the goal of this study was to optimize and evaluate an RT-qPCR assay on rectal swabs collected from a group of carcasses of leporids of different species that were submitted to a VDL during an RHDV2 outbreak. A total of 130 carcasses were tested both by liver tissue and rectal swab RT-qPCR. The results of the liver samples were considered the gold standard, and 73 carcasses tested positive and 57 carcasses tested negative in liver. Out of the 73 liver RT-qPCR-positive carcasses, 64 tested positive and 9 tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. All 57 liver RT-qPCR-negative carcasses tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the rectal RT-qPCR were 88% and 100%, respectively, most likely due to significantly (p<0.001) lower viral loads in the rectal swabs (median Ct: 27.03) compared to the liver samples (median Ct: 12.69). Despite being more than 4 logs less sensitive, RT-qPCRs from rectal swabs can be used to screen leporid carcasses for the presence of RHDV2 RNA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/1869692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Carcasses ; Contamination ; Diagnostic systems ; Environmental risk ; Epidemics ; Feces ; Hemorrhagic disease ; Laboratories ; Liver ; Normal distribution ; Rabbit hemorrhagic disease ; Rabbits ; Rectum ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023-03, Vol.2023, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Javier Asin et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Javier Asin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6178-4801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2802492081/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2802492081?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Simulundu, Edgar</contributor><contributor>Edgar Simulundu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Asin, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolon, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Deana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejmanek, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzal, Francisco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Beate M.</creatorcontrib><title>An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases</title><title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><description>Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usually seek alternate diagnostic approaches that permit simpler and faster sample collection with less risk of environmental contamination; there is also a necessity for a sample type that can be collected from live animals. Therefore, the goal of this study was to optimize and evaluate an RT-qPCR assay on rectal swabs collected from a group of carcasses of leporids of different species that were submitted to a VDL during an RHDV2 outbreak. A total of 130 carcasses were tested both by liver tissue and rectal swab RT-qPCR. The results of the liver samples were considered the gold standard, and 73 carcasses tested positive and 57 carcasses tested negative in liver. Out of the 73 liver RT-qPCR-positive carcasses, 64 tested positive and 9 tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. All 57 liver RT-qPCR-negative carcasses tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the rectal RT-qPCR were 88% and 100%, respectively, most likely due to significantly (p<0.001) lower viral loads in the rectal swabs (median Ct: 27.03) compared to the liver samples (median Ct: 12.69). Despite being more than 4 logs less sensitive, RT-qPCRs from rectal swabs can be used to screen leporid carcasses for the presence of RHDV2 RNA.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Hemorrhagic disease</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Rabbit hemorrhagic disease</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1865-1674</issn><issn>1865-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd3_oAXvNS6fLRJeznqx4ShUqe3JW0Sl7m1W9Iy9u_N2PDSq_dweDiH9yB0TfA9IUkyopiyEUl5xjN6ggZBJRHhKT390yI-RxfeLzDmOOPJAP2MGyhm0eY9L2DsvdyBce0KCl13cgkfW1l5MK2Dbq7hQXfBtm0DrYFCVpXtYKJXrXNz-W1reLBeS6_hy7reAwXbwKvseheC8uD7S3Rm5NLrq-Mdos-nx1k-iaZvzy_5eBrVjIkuYiqtY50xkSimBVaCSZXUirE0_FgpLDlhRjHFDEkqg0UcG40zxaURouZSsSG6OeSuXbvpte_KRdu7JlSWNMU0zihOSaDuDlTtWu-dNuXa2ZV0u5Lgcj9nuZ-zPM4Z8NsDPreNklv7P_0LcYNzRA</recordid><startdate>20230324</startdate><enddate>20230324</enddate><creator>Asin, Javier</creator><creator>Moriarty, Megan E.</creator><creator>Mikolon, Andrea B.</creator><creator>Clifford, Deana L.</creator><creator>Rejmanek, Daniel</creator><creator>Uzal, Francisco A.</creator><creator>Crossley, Beate M.</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-4801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230324</creationdate><title>An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases</title><author>Asin, Javier ; Moriarty, Megan E. ; Mikolon, Andrea B. ; Clifford, Deana L. ; Rejmanek, Daniel ; Uzal, Francisco A. ; Crossley, Beate M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Hemorrhagic disease</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Rabbit hemorrhagic disease</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asin, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikolon, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clifford, Deana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejmanek, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzal, Francisco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossley, Beate M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asin, Javier</au><au>Moriarty, Megan E.</au><au>Mikolon, Andrea B.</au><au>Clifford, Deana L.</au><au>Rejmanek, Daniel</au><au>Uzal, Francisco A.</au><au>Crossley, Beate M.</au><au>Simulundu, Edgar</au><au>Edgar Simulundu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases</atitle><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle><date>2023-03-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>1865-1674</issn><eissn>1865-1682</eissn><abstract>Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2 or Lagovirus europaeus GI.2) is spreading across North America. This has enabled submissions of lagomorphs for testing to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs). The liver is currently the gold-standard sample type for testing by RT-qPCR. VDL clients usually seek alternate diagnostic approaches that permit simpler and faster sample collection with less risk of environmental contamination; there is also a necessity for a sample type that can be collected from live animals. Therefore, the goal of this study was to optimize and evaluate an RT-qPCR assay on rectal swabs collected from a group of carcasses of leporids of different species that were submitted to a VDL during an RHDV2 outbreak. A total of 130 carcasses were tested both by liver tissue and rectal swab RT-qPCR. The results of the liver samples were considered the gold standard, and 73 carcasses tested positive and 57 carcasses tested negative in liver. Out of the 73 liver RT-qPCR-positive carcasses, 64 tested positive and 9 tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. All 57 liver RT-qPCR-negative carcasses tested negative on the rectal RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the rectal RT-qPCR were 88% and 100%, respectively, most likely due to significantly (p<0.001) lower viral loads in the rectal swabs (median Ct: 27.03) compared to the liver samples (median Ct: 12.69). Despite being more than 4 logs less sensitive, RT-qPCRs from rectal swabs can be used to screen leporid carcasses for the presence of RHDV2 RNA.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/1869692</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-4801</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-1674 |
ispartof | Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023-03, Vol.2023, p.1-5 |
issn | 1865-1674 1865-1682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2802492081 |
source | Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; ProQuest Publicly Available Content database |
subjects | Age groups Carcasses Contamination Diagnostic systems Environmental risk Epidemics Feces Hemorrhagic disease Laboratories Liver Normal distribution Rabbit hemorrhagic disease Rabbits Rectum Viruses |
title | An RT-qPCR Assay from Rectal Swabs for the Detection of Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus 2 in Natural Cases |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20RT-qPCR%20Assay%20from%20Rectal%20Swabs%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20Rabbit%20Hemorrhagic%20Disease%20Virus%202%20in%20Natural%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Transboundary%20and%20emerging%20diseases&rft.au=Asin,%20Javier&rft.date=2023-03-24&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=1865-1674&rft.eissn=1865-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/1869692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2802492081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3d8c4e9375d3e70d73ad5cd338155bd0a613fd3d3f15bf0744fe09d6af77c6ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802492081&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |