Corrected calculation of the overestimated ejection fraction in valvular heart disease by phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for better prediction of patient morbidity

• Published in: Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine 2020-01, Vol.51 (1), p.11-11
• Main Authors: Yousef, Hosam A, Hamdan, Abdulrahman E. S, Elminshawy, Ahmed, Mohammed, Nisreen A. A, Ibrahim, Ahmed S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blood; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR); Cardiac patients; Cardiovascular disease; Coronary vessels; Ejection fraction; Ejection fraction (EF); Heart; Heart failure; Heart valve diseases; Hemodynamics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Methods; Patients; Phase contrast (PC); Regurgitation; Reproducibility; Tomography; Valvular heart diseases (VHD); Velocity
• ISSN: 0378-603X; 2090-4762
• DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0130-8

Background To establish a more accurate technique for the assessment of the left ventricular function correlated with patients' clinical condition avoiding the miscalculation of the ejection fraction in valvular regurgitation. A prospective study carried out between July 2018 and June 2019. The studied group included 35 subjects, 25 patients with valvular regurgitation, and 10 healthy control subjects. All subjects underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination to evaluate the ejection fraction by two methods: the volumetric method which assesses stroke volume via subtraction of the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume, and phase-contrast method which assesses the aortic stroke volume via a through-plane phase contrast across the aortic valve. The sensitivity, specificity, P value and the area under the curve of both methods were calculated. Results In the healthy group, using the volumetric method, the calculated mean ejection fraction was 62.44 ± 6.61, while that calculated by the phase-contrast method was 64.34 ± 5.33, with a non-significant difference (P = 0.62) showing the validity of the phase-contrast method. In the patients' group, by using the volumetric method, the calculated mean ejection fraction was 47.17 ± 14.31%, which was significantly higher than that calculated by the phase-contrast method (29.39 ± 7.98%) (P = 0.02). According to the results of the calculation of the ejection fraction by the volumetric method, there were 18 patients (72%) having impaired cardiac function and 7 (28%) patients of normal function; while according to the phase-contrast method, all the 25 patients had impaired cardiac function. The current study shows that the phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance had 89.29% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity in diagnosing impaired cardiac function with the area under the curve of 0.87 (P = 0.00). Conclusion The phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance can provide a better assessment of the ejection fraction in valvular regurgitation.