The strongman presidency and the two logics of presidential power

The strongman presidency presents an acute threat to democracy. Two logics underpin its emergence, both of which implicate the administrative state. Under the first, presidents have sought to deploy the vast resources of the administrative state in pursuit of power and legacy. This logic is symmetri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Presidential studies quarterly 2023-06, Vol.53 (2), p.145-168
Main Authors: Howell, William G., Moe, Terry M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
administrative state
Democracy
Political power
Power
presidential power
Presidential powers
Presidents
Sabotage
State power
Threats
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The strongman presidency presents an acute threat to democracy. Two logics underpin its emergence, both of which implicate the administrative state. Under the first, presidents have sought to deploy the vast resources of the administrative state in pursuit of power and legacy. This logic is symmetric, shaping the behavior of Republican and Democratic presidents alike. The second logic, however, sets them apart. Because most of the administrative state is the embodiment of progressive values, Democratic presidents have approached presidential power in ways that are largely compatible with its well‐being, whereas Republican presidents have laid claim to increasingly extreme powers in order to retrench and sabotage it. Layered on the first, this asymmetric logic is the main driver of the strongman presidency—and, ultimately, a major threat to American democracy.
ISSN:0360-4918
1741-5705
DOI:10.1111/psq.12830