Loading…

Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition

To evaluate the grain yield and quality of ten quinoa genotypes, four simultaneous field experiments were conducted in different regions (Karaj, Shahrekord, Urmia, and Kashmar) of semi-arid condition of Iran, based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during the 2018 growing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gesunde Pflanzen 2023-08, Vol.75 (4), p.993-1002
Main Authors: Etaati, Maryam, Ardakani, M. Reza, Bagheri, Mahmoud, Paknejad, Farzad, Golzardi, Farid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3
container_end_page 1002
container_issue 4
container_start_page 993
container_title Gesunde Pflanzen
container_volume 75
creator Etaati, Maryam
Ardakani, M. Reza
Bagheri, Mahmoud
Paknejad, Farzad
Golzardi, Farid
description To evaluate the grain yield and quality of ten quinoa genotypes, four simultaneous field experiments were conducted in different regions (Karaj, Shahrekord, Urmia, and Kashmar) of semi-arid condition of Iran, based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during the 2018 growing season. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes in grain yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition. The results also showed that the superior genotype in Karaj in terms of grain yield was the Q26 genotype (716 kg ha −1 ), in Shahrekord the Q26 genotype (2196 kg ha −1 ), in Urmia the Q18 genotype (1614 kg ha −1 ), and in Kashmar the Titicaca genotype (829 kg ha −1 ). The highest 1000-grain weight (3.6 g) belonged to the Q31 genotype in Urmia. The lowest saponin content was observed in the Q12 genotype in Urmia. The protein content was not significantly different between the studied genotypes, but the highest and lowest levels (16.22 and 13.95 g kg −1 , respectively) were observed in Q12 and Q29 genotypes, respectively. The evaluated genotypes were significantly different in terms of iron content ( p  ≤ 0.01) and calcium ( p  ≤ 0.05). The maximum and minimum oil content (3.68 and 2.52, respectively) was found in the Q18 and Red Carina genotypes, respectively. Considering both quantitative and qualitative traits, the Giza1 and Q26 genotypes were superior and could be recommended for cultivation in semi-arid regions of Iran.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10343-022-00772-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2839587378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839587378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOHDEQtVAiMSH8ACdLuRApJl7abvcRtcKAhCBRWMTJcnshRj3tie0-zA_kuzE0UW45larqLVUPgCOCTwjG7ddMMGsYwpSi2rYUiT2wIg3rUJ3zd2CFmWhRQynbBx9yfsKYtEzyFfizTjpM8CG40X6BV3NJoYQ46RHe6XF2UE8WnulSdvDUBJvh9xR9GB2MHv6YwxQ1PO5_uSluow3z5u_sPoyjPfkM13VTdluXYfX46TYB6RQs7Mew0SUY2MfJvvp9BO-9HrM7fKsH4Pbs201_ji6v1xf96SUyjHQFCWNlR3EjnTNDy32jhfGMNc2gB4Gl5tLIgXnhW6Ilt3zwBg-CCk6E5I0b2AH4tOhuU_w9u1zUU5xTfTcrKlnHZctaWVF0QZkUc07Oq22qF6edIli95K2WvFXNW73mrUQlsYWUK3h6dOmf9H9Yz7uSg6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839587378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Etaati, Maryam ; Ardakani, M. Reza ; Bagheri, Mahmoud ; Paknejad, Farzad ; Golzardi, Farid</creator><creatorcontrib>Etaati, Maryam ; Ardakani, M. Reza ; Bagheri, Mahmoud ; Paknejad, Farzad ; Golzardi, Farid</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the grain yield and quality of ten quinoa genotypes, four simultaneous field experiments were conducted in different regions (Karaj, Shahrekord, Urmia, and Kashmar) of semi-arid condition of Iran, based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during the 2018 growing season. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes in grain yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition. The results also showed that the superior genotype in Karaj in terms of grain yield was the Q26 genotype (716 kg ha −1 ), in Shahrekord the Q26 genotype (2196 kg ha −1 ), in Urmia the Q18 genotype (1614 kg ha −1 ), and in Kashmar the Titicaca genotype (829 kg ha −1 ). The highest 1000-grain weight (3.6 g) belonged to the Q31 genotype in Urmia. The lowest saponin content was observed in the Q12 genotype in Urmia. The protein content was not significantly different between the studied genotypes, but the highest and lowest levels (16.22 and 13.95 g kg −1 , respectively) were observed in Q12 and Q29 genotypes, respectively. The evaluated genotypes were significantly different in terms of iron content ( p  ≤ 0.01) and calcium ( p  ≤ 0.05). The maximum and minimum oil content (3.68 and 2.52, respectively) was found in the Q18 and Red Carina genotypes, respectively. Considering both quantitative and qualitative traits, the Giza1 and Q26 genotypes were superior and could be recommended for cultivation in semi-arid regions of Iran.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0367-4223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10343-022-00772-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Arid regions ; Arid zones ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climatic conditions ; Crop yield ; Fatty acid composition ; Fatty acids ; Field tests ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Genotypes ; Growing season ; Hydroxyapatite ; Life Sciences ; Nutritive value ; Oils &amp; fats ; Original Article ; Originalbeitrag ; Plant Pathology ; Quinoa ; Saponins ; Semi arid areas ; Semiarid lands ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Gesunde Pflanzen, 2023-08, Vol.75 (4), p.993-1002</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, part of Springer Nature 2022. corrected publication 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3466-4756</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etaati, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardakani, M. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golzardi, Farid</creatorcontrib><title>Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition</title><title>Gesunde Pflanzen</title><addtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</addtitle><description>To evaluate the grain yield and quality of ten quinoa genotypes, four simultaneous field experiments were conducted in different regions (Karaj, Shahrekord, Urmia, and Kashmar) of semi-arid condition of Iran, based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during the 2018 growing season. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes in grain yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition. The results also showed that the superior genotype in Karaj in terms of grain yield was the Q26 genotype (716 kg ha −1 ), in Shahrekord the Q26 genotype (2196 kg ha −1 ), in Urmia the Q18 genotype (1614 kg ha −1 ), and in Kashmar the Titicaca genotype (829 kg ha −1 ). The highest 1000-grain weight (3.6 g) belonged to the Q31 genotype in Urmia. The lowest saponin content was observed in the Q12 genotype in Urmia. The protein content was not significantly different between the studied genotypes, but the highest and lowest levels (16.22 and 13.95 g kg −1 , respectively) were observed in Q12 and Q29 genotypes, respectively. The evaluated genotypes were significantly different in terms of iron content ( p  ≤ 0.01) and calcium ( p  ≤ 0.05). The maximum and minimum oil content (3.68 and 2.52, respectively) was found in the Q18 and Red Carina genotypes, respectively. Considering both quantitative and qualitative traits, the Giza1 and Q26 genotypes were superior and could be recommended for cultivation in semi-arid regions of Iran.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Fatty acid composition</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nutritive value</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Originalbeitrag</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Quinoa</subject><subject>Saponins</subject><subject>Semi arid areas</subject><subject>Semiarid lands</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0367-4223</issn><issn>1439-0345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMlOHDEQtVAiMSH8ACdLuRApJl7abvcRtcKAhCBRWMTJcnshRj3tie0-zA_kuzE0UW45larqLVUPgCOCTwjG7ddMMGsYwpSi2rYUiT2wIg3rUJ3zd2CFmWhRQynbBx9yfsKYtEzyFfizTjpM8CG40X6BV3NJoYQ46RHe6XF2UE8WnulSdvDUBJvh9xR9GB2MHv6YwxQ1PO5_uSluow3z5u_sPoyjPfkM13VTdluXYfX46TYB6RQs7Mew0SUY2MfJvvp9BO-9HrM7fKsH4Pbs201_ji6v1xf96SUyjHQFCWNlR3EjnTNDy32jhfGMNc2gB4Gl5tLIgXnhW6Ilt3zwBg-CCk6E5I0b2AH4tOhuU_w9u1zUU5xTfTcrKlnHZctaWVF0QZkUc07Oq22qF6edIli95K2WvFXNW73mrUQlsYWUK3h6dOmf9H9Yz7uSg6Q</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Etaati, Maryam</creator><creator>Ardakani, M. Reza</creator><creator>Bagheri, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Paknejad, Farzad</creator><creator>Golzardi, Farid</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-4756</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition</title><author>Etaati, Maryam ; Ardakani, M. Reza ; Bagheri, Mahmoud ; Paknejad, Farzad ; Golzardi, Farid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Fatty acid composition</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nutritive value</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Originalbeitrag</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Quinoa</topic><topic>Saponins</topic><topic>Semi arid areas</topic><topic>Semiarid lands</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etaati, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardakani, M. Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagheri, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paknejad, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golzardi, Farid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etaati, Maryam</au><au>Ardakani, M. Reza</au><au>Bagheri, Mahmoud</au><au>Paknejad, Farzad</au><au>Golzardi, Farid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition</atitle><jtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</jtitle><stitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>993-1002</pages><issn>0367-4223</issn><eissn>1439-0345</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the grain yield and quality of ten quinoa genotypes, four simultaneous field experiments were conducted in different regions (Karaj, Shahrekord, Urmia, and Kashmar) of semi-arid condition of Iran, based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during the 2018 growing season. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes in grain yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition. The results also showed that the superior genotype in Karaj in terms of grain yield was the Q26 genotype (716 kg ha −1 ), in Shahrekord the Q26 genotype (2196 kg ha −1 ), in Urmia the Q18 genotype (1614 kg ha −1 ), and in Kashmar the Titicaca genotype (829 kg ha −1 ). The highest 1000-grain weight (3.6 g) belonged to the Q31 genotype in Urmia. The lowest saponin content was observed in the Q12 genotype in Urmia. The protein content was not significantly different between the studied genotypes, but the highest and lowest levels (16.22 and 13.95 g kg −1 , respectively) were observed in Q12 and Q29 genotypes, respectively. The evaluated genotypes were significantly different in terms of iron content ( p  ≤ 0.01) and calcium ( p  ≤ 0.05). The maximum and minimum oil content (3.68 and 2.52, respectively) was found in the Q18 and Red Carina genotypes, respectively. Considering both quantitative and qualitative traits, the Giza1 and Q26 genotypes were superior and could be recommended for cultivation in semi-arid regions of Iran.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10343-022-00772-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-4756</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0367-4223
ispartof Gesunde Pflanzen, 2023-08, Vol.75 (4), p.993-1002
issn 0367-4223
1439-0345
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2839587378
source Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Arid regions
Arid zones
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climatic conditions
Crop yield
Fatty acid composition
Fatty acids
Field tests
Genotype & phenotype
Genotypes
Growing season
Hydroxyapatite
Life Sciences
Nutritive value
Oils & fats
Original Article
Originalbeitrag
Plant Pathology
Quinoa
Saponins
Semi arid areas
Semiarid lands
Variance analysis
title Grain Yield, Nutritional Value and Fatty Acids Profile of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Semi-arid Climatic Condition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grain%20Yield,%20Nutritional%20Value%20and%20Fatty%20Acids%20Profile%20of%20Quinoa%20(Chenopodium%20Quinoa%20Willd.)%20Genotypes%20in%20Semi-arid%20Climatic%20Condition&rft.jtitle=Gesunde%20Pflanzen&rft.au=Etaati,%20Maryam&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=993-1002&rft.issn=0367-4223&rft.eissn=1439-0345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10343-022-00772-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839587378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6cd892048eecb75f4a6cf3344bab608a58c8b3f6f71a85d5bfc0b626516854eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839587378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true