Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil

Plagiarism allegations are not rare in the history of science, and credit for prior work was and continues to be a source of disputes, involving notions of priority of discovery and of plagiarism. However, consensus over what constitutes plagiarism among scientists from different fields cannot be ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accountability in research 2023-12, Vol.30 (7), p.407-438
Main Authors: Vasconcelos, Sonia M. R., Masuda, Hatisaburo, Sorenson, Martha, Prosdocimi, Francisco, Palácios, Marisa, Watanabe, Edson, Carlos Pinto, José, Lapa e Silva, José Roberto, Vieyra, Adalberto, Pinto, André, Mena-Chalco, Jesús, Sant'Ana, Mauricio, Roig, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Brazil
Engineering
Graduate studies
Humanities
Humans
Intellectual property
Plagiarism
quantitative research
Research ethics
research integrity
research misconduct
Scientific method
Scientific Misconduct
survey
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Plagiarism allegations are not rare in the history of science, and credit for prior work was and continues to be a source of disputes, involving notions of priority of discovery and of plagiarism. However, consensus over what constitutes plagiarism among scientists from different fields cannot be taken for granted. We conducted a national survey exploring perceptions of plagiarism among PhD holders registered in the database of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. This survey was sent to 143,405 PhD holders across the fields, in the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts, with a response rate of about 20%. The results suggest that core principles about plagiarism are shared among this multidisciplinary community, corroborating Robert K. Merton's observations that concerns over plagiarism and priority disputes are not field specific. This study offers insight into the way plagiarism is perceived in this community and sheds light on the problem for international collaborative research networks. The data focus on a particular research system in Latin America, but, given the cultural similarities that bind most Latin American nations, these results may be relevant to other PhD populations in the region and should provide an opportunity for comparison with studies from other emerging, non-Anglophone regions.
ISSN:0898-9621
1545-5815
DOI:10.1080/08989621.2021.2018306