Surveillance Load: A Burden of Search Borne by Black and Brown Bodies

Racial threat hypothesis contends that growing minority populations produce a threat to social order that results in the weaponization of the criminal justice apparatus. We hypothesize this threat has resulted in the incommensurate surveillance of Black and Brown communities. We define this phenomen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical criminology (Richmond, B.C.) B.C.), 2023-06, Vol.31 (2), p.451-466
Main Authors: Chu, Sarah P., Pezzella, Frank S., Evans, Justice D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Big Data
Biometrics
Black people
Case studies
Cities
Community
Criminal justice
Criminal statistics
Criminalization
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Digitization
Hegemony
Hypotheses
Jurisprudence
Law and Criminolgy
Minority & ethnic groups
Race
Racial differences
Racial inequality
Racism
Social control
Social order
Surveillance
Technology
Threats
White people
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Racial threat hypothesis contends that growing minority populations produce a threat to social order that results in the weaponization of the criminal justice apparatus. We hypothesize this threat has resulted in the incommensurate surveillance of Black and Brown communities. We define this phenomenon as surveillance load, the disproportionate accumulation or “load” of social control which grows heavier as surveillance technologies and strategies amass. Assessments of these tools are typically conducted in a vacuum without contemplating the collective impact of the larger surveillance infrastructure on Black and Brown communities. We use the application of surveillance technologies in NYC to illustrate surveillance load and argue that unregulated government use of location, biometric, and identity surveillance technologies has exacerbated racial disparities in policing, is amplified by counterterrorism strategies, and outpaced Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Finally, we propose policy recommendations that create system-level controls over surveillance technologies and engage affected communities.
ISSN:1205-8629
1572-9877
DOI:10.1007/s10612-022-09673-6