Loading…
A Novel Hybrid Quantum-Classical Framework for an In-vehicle Controller Area Network Intrusion Detection
In-vehicle controller area network (CAN) is susceptible to various cyberattacks due to its broadcast-based communication nature. In this study, we developed a hybrid quantum-classical CAN intrusion detection framework using a classical neural network (NN) and a quantum restricted Boltzmann machine (...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE access 2023-01, Vol.11, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In-vehicle controller area network (CAN) is susceptible to various cyberattacks due to its broadcast-based communication nature. In this study, we developed a hybrid quantum-classical CAN intrusion detection framework using a classical neural network (NN) and a quantum restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM). The classical NN is dedicated for feature extraction from CAN images generated from a vehicle's CAN bus data, while the quantum RBM is dedicated for CAN image reconstruction for a classification-based intrusion detection. To evaluate the performance of the hybrid quantum-classical CAN intrusion detection framework, we used a real-world CAN fuzzy attack dataset to create three separate attack datasets, where each dataset represents a unique set of features related to the vehicle. We compared the performance of our hybrid framework to a similar but classical-only framework. Our analyses showed that the hybrid framework performs better in CAN intrusion detection compared to the classical-only framework. For the three datasets considered in this study, the best models in the hybrid framework achieved 97.5%, 97%, and 98.3% intrusion detection accuracies, and 94.7%, 93.9%, and 97.2% recall, respectively, whereas the best models in the classical-only framework achieved 86.7%, 95%, and 89.7% intrusion detection accuracies, and 70.7%, 89.8, and 80.6% recall, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3304331 |