Do unique names fit people for creative work? Implications for job recruitment, name change, and product evaluation

Unique names have commonly been viewed as undesirable. However, our studies (total N = 6049) suggest the opposite: unique names are perceived as favourable to creativity in occupational contexts. Generally, people held a perception that unique‐named individuals are more creative (albeit less likable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology 2023-12, Vol.53 (7), p.1524-1541
Main Authors: Bao, Han‐Wu‐Shuang, Lu, Huanhua, Luo, Yu L. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artists
Candidates
Creativity
Motion pictures
name
occupation
Professions
Recruitment
social cognition
stereotype
Stereotypes
uniqueness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Unique names have commonly been viewed as undesirable. However, our studies (total N = 6049) suggest the opposite: unique names are perceived as favourable to creativity in occupational contexts. Generally, people held a perception that unique‐named individuals are more creative (albeit less likable) and therefore more suitable for jobs requiring greater creativity (Studies 1–2). Accordingly, participants tended to select candidates with more unique names for creative positions (Study 3) and recommend more unique names to workers in creative jobs for a name change (Study 4). Furthermore, real‐world archival data revealed that artists (typical creative professions) tended to adopt more unique new names, which was replicated cross‐culturally in American, British, and Chinese samples (Study 5), and that Chinese movie directors with more unique names received higher evaluations for the movies they directed (Study 6). Our findings demonstrate a novel form of name stereotype and its behavioural manifestations and real‐world consequences.
ISSN:0046-2772
1099-0992
DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2994